Imaging of Soft Tissues Adjacent to Orthopedic Hardware: Comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI

被引:28
|
作者
Farrelly, Cormac [1 ]
Davarpanah, Amir [2 ]
Brennan, Stephen [3 ]
Sampson, Mathew [4 ]
Eustace, Stephen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cappagh Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 11, Ireland
[2] Northwestern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Cappagh Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Dublin 11, Ireland
[4] Sports Surg Clin, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
1.5; T; 3; artifact reduction; MRI; susceptibility; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; MUSCULOSKELETAL MRI; METALLIC IMPLANTS; SPIN-ECHO; ARTIFACTS; REPLACEMENT; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; IMAGES; 3.0T;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.08.1740
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact reduction techniques at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A titanium plate with steel screws was placed in a freshly harvested pig leg. The leg was imaged with 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. A T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was used with echo-train lengths of 8, 16, 32, and 64 and a constant readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz. The images were compared qualitatively, and the optimal echotrain length was selected. Images were acquired at the optimal echo-train length with four different readout bandwidths. Artifact was measured quantitatively, and image quality was ranked qualitatively. The qualitatively best image acquired at 1.5 T was compared with the qualitatively highest-ranked image acquired at 3 T. RESULTS. At both 1.5 T and 3 T, optimal images of equal quality were produced at echotrain lengths of 8 and 16. At higher readout bandwidths, there was quantitatively less artifact. The qualitatively best images were acquired at a readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz at 1.5 T and 62.5 kHz at 3 T (Cronbach's alpha = 1.00). The optimal image at 3 T was qualitatively superior to that at 1.5 T. CONCLUSION. Optimizing image acquisition parameters in this phantom model resulted in similar quantitative susceptibility artifact at 3 T and 1.5 T and better qualitative images at 3 T than at 1.5 T.
引用
收藏
页码:W60 / W64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee
    Pieter Van Dyck
    Christoph Kenis
    Filip M. Vanhoenacker
    Valérie Lambrecht
    Kristien Wouters
    Jan L. Gielen
    Lieven Dossche
    Paul M. Parizel
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1376 - 1384
  • [32] Contrast-Enhanced MR Neuroimaging Protocols at 1.5-T and 3-T: Results of an Expert Consensus Panel
    Kuhn, M.
    Rowley, H.
    Tanenbaum, L.
    Enterline, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (05)
  • [33] MR imaging of the wrist:: Comparison between 1.5-and 3-T MR imaging -: Preliminary experience
    Saupe, N
    Pruessmann, KP
    Luechinger, R
    Bösiger, P
    Marincek, B
    Weishaupt, D
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 256 - 264
  • [34] Sensitivity of a 1.5-T MRI system for electromagnetic fields
    Harberts, Dick W.
    van Helvoort, Mark
    2014 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC EUROPE), 2014, : 856 - 859
  • [35] 1.5-T MRI, CT, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND SCINTIGRAPHY IN HYPERPARATHYROIDISM
    VONSCHULTHESS, GK
    WEDER, W
    GOEBEL, N
    BUCHMANN, P
    GADZE, A
    AUGUSTINY, N
    LARGIADER, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1988, 8 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [36] 1.5-T SURFACE-COIL MRI OF THE KNEE
    BURK, DL
    KANAL, E
    BRUNBERG, JA
    JOHNSTONE, GF
    SWENSEN, HE
    WOLF, GL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (02) : 293 - 300
  • [37] Simple changes to 1.5-T MRI abdomen and pelvis protocols to optimize results at 3 T
    Cornfeld, Daniel
    Weinreb, Jeffery
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (02) : W140 - W150
  • [38] PATIENT ANESTHESIA AND MONITORING AT A 1.5-T MRI INSTALLATION
    KARLIK, SJ
    HEATHERLEY, T
    PAVAN, F
    STEIN, J
    LEBRON, F
    RUTT, B
    CAREY, L
    WEXLER, R
    GELB, A
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (02) : 210 - 221
  • [39] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen at 3 T: Image Quality Comparison With 1.5-T Magnet Using 3 Different Imaging Sequences
    Saremi, Farhood
    Jalili, Mehdi
    Sefidbakht, Sepideh
    Channual, Stephanie
    Quane, Lisa
    Naderi, Nassim
    Schultze-Haakh, Helmuth
    Torrone, Maria
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [40] Comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders
    Bourgioti, Charis
    Zafeiropoulou, Konstantina
    Tzavara, Chara
    Daskalakis, George
    Fotopoulos, Stavros
    Theodora, Marianna
    Nikolaidou, Maria Evangelia
    Konidari, Marianna
    Gourtsoyianni, Sofia
    Panourgias, Evangelia
    Koutoulidis, Vassilis
    Martzoukos, Epameinondas Anastasios
    Konstantinidou, Anastasia Evangelia
    Moulopoulos, Lia Angela
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (09) : 408 - 417