MR imaging of the wrist:: Comparison between 1.5-and 3-T MR imaging -: Preliminary experience

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained from 25 healthy volunteers and 15 consecutive patients with chronic wrist pain or suspected carpal mass, and 1.5- and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the wrist was prospectively performed with comparable sequence parameters and surface coils of the same geometric design. Imaging protocols at both field strengths included a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, two intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences with different echo times and with and without fat saturation, and a three-dimensional fast field-echo sequence. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and bone and between bone and ; cartilage was calculated for both field strengths. The visibility of various anatomic structures, including the triangular fibrocartilage complex, carpal ligaments, nerves, and cartilage, was analyzed with a four-point grading scale. CNRs were significantly higher on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (P < .001; analysis of variance) for all sequences. Visibility of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and intercarpal ligaments and cartilage was significantly better on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (paired sign test). © RSNA 2004.