Imaging of Soft Tissues Adjacent to Orthopedic Hardware: Comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI

被引:28
|
作者
Farrelly, Cormac [1 ]
Davarpanah, Amir [2 ]
Brennan, Stephen [3 ]
Sampson, Mathew [4 ]
Eustace, Stephen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cappagh Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 11, Ireland
[2] Northwestern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Cappagh Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Dublin 11, Ireland
[4] Sports Surg Clin, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
1.5; T; 3; artifact reduction; MRI; susceptibility; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; MUSCULOSKELETAL MRI; METALLIC IMPLANTS; SPIN-ECHO; ARTIFACTS; REPLACEMENT; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; IMAGES; 3.0T;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.08.1740
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact reduction techniques at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A titanium plate with steel screws was placed in a freshly harvested pig leg. The leg was imaged with 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. A T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was used with echo-train lengths of 8, 16, 32, and 64 and a constant readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz. The images were compared qualitatively, and the optimal echotrain length was selected. Images were acquired at the optimal echo-train length with four different readout bandwidths. Artifact was measured quantitatively, and image quality was ranked qualitatively. The qualitatively best image acquired at 1.5 T was compared with the qualitatively highest-ranked image acquired at 3 T. RESULTS. At both 1.5 T and 3 T, optimal images of equal quality were produced at echotrain lengths of 8 and 16. At higher readout bandwidths, there was quantitatively less artifact. The qualitatively best images were acquired at a readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz at 1.5 T and 62.5 kHz at 3 T (Cronbach's alpha = 1.00). The optimal image at 3 T was qualitatively superior to that at 1.5 T. CONCLUSION. Optimizing image acquisition parameters in this phantom model resulted in similar quantitative susceptibility artifact at 3 T and 1.5 T and better qualitative images at 3 T than at 1.5 T.
引用
收藏
页码:W60 / W64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement
    Crespo-Rodriguez, Ana
    De Lucas-Villarrubia, Jose
    Pastrana-Ledesma, Miguel
    Hualde-Juvera, Ana
    Mendez-Alonso, Santiago
    Padron, Mario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 88 : 109 - 116
  • [42] Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners
    Sonesson, Mikael
    Al-Qabandi, Fahad
    Mansson, Sven
    Abdulraheem, Salem
    Bondemark, Lars
    Hellen-Halme, Kristina
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2021, 51 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [43] FIELD-STRENGTH IN NEURO-MR IMAGING - A COMPARISON OF 0.5-T AND 1.5-T
    JACK, CR
    BERQUIST, TH
    MILLER, GM
    FORBES, GS
    GRAY, JE
    MORIN, RL
    ILSTRUP, DM
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (04) : 505 - 513
  • [44] Time-of-flight MR angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging - Initial experience
    Willinek, WA
    Born, M
    Simon, B
    Tschampa, HJ
    Krautmacher, C
    Gieseke, J
    Urbach, H
    Textor, HJ
    Schild, HH
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) : 913 - 920
  • [45] INVIVO NA-23 IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    PERMAN, WH
    TURSKI, P
    HAYES, C
    GLOVER, GH
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1985, 32 (10) : 885 - 885
  • [46] Cartilage Imaging of the Hand and Wrist Using 3-T MRI
    Weber, Marc-Andre
    von Stillfried, Falko
    Kloth, Jost K.
    Rehnitz, Christoph
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 16 (02) : 71 - 87
  • [47] ACHILLES-TENDON - MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    QUINN, SF
    MURRAY, WT
    CLARK, RA
    COCHRAN, CF
    RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (03) : 767 - 770
  • [48] Performance Comparison of 1.5-T Endorectal Coil MRI with 3.0-T Nonendorectal Coil MRI in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Shah, Zarine K.
    Elias, Saba N.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Zynger, Debra L.
    DeRenne, Lawrence A.
    Knopp, Michael V.
    Guo, Beibei
    Schurr, Ryan
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Jia, Guang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 467 - 474
  • [49] COMPARISON OF P-31 MRS AND H-1 MRI AT 1.5-T AND 2.0-T
    BOSKA, MD
    HUBESCH, B
    MEYERHOFF, DJ
    TWIEG, DB
    KARCZMAR, GS
    MATSON, GB
    WEINER, MW
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 13 (02) : 228 - 238
  • [50] ANKLE - SURFACE COIL MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    BELTRAN, J
    NOTO, AM
    MOSURE, JC
    SHAMAM, OM
    WEISS, KL
    ZUELZER, WA
    RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (01) : 203 - 209