The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization

被引:85
|
作者
Kohli, Michele [1 ]
Maschio, Michael [1 ]
Becker, Debbie [1 ]
Weinstein, Milton C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Quadrant Hlth Econ Inc, 92 Cottonwood Crescent, Cambridge, ON, Canada
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Coronavirus; COVID-19; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Economic analysis; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. Methods: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. Results: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. Conclusions: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained < $50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of the updated COVID-19 mRNA Autumn 2024 vaccines in the United Kingdom
    Kohli, Michele
    Maschio, Michael
    Lee, Amy
    Joshi, Keya
    Carroll, Stuart
    Balogh, Orsolya
    van de Velde, Nicolas
    Beck, Ekkehard
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 27 (01) : 1359 - 1372
  • [42] ECONOMIC VALUE AND HEALTH SYSTEM IMPACT OF REMDESIVIR IN TREATING HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES
    Sun, F.
    Jeyakumar, S.
    Smith, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S10 - S10
  • [43] A Social Media-Based Public Health Campaign Encouraging COVID-19 Vaccination Across the United States
    Hunt, Isabella de Vere
    Dunn, Tamara
    Mahoney, Megan
    Chen, Michael
    Nava, Vanessa
    Linos, Eleni
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 112 (09) : 1253 - 1256
  • [44] PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RECOMBINANT ZOSTER VACCINE FOR VACCINATING IMMUNOCOMPROMISED ADULTS AGAINST HERPES ZOSTER IN THE UNITED STATES
    Salem, A.
    Curran, D.
    Carrico, J.
    La, E. M.
    Lorenc, S.
    Hicks, K.
    Poston, S.
    Carpenter, C. F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S159 - S159
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study
    Reddy, Krishna P.
    Shebl, Fatma M.
    Foote, Julia H. A.
    Harling, Guy
    Scott, Justine A.
    Panella, Christopher
    Fitzmaurice, Kieran P.
    Flanagan, Clare
    Hyle, Emily P.
    Neilan, Anne M.
    Mohareb, Amir M.
    Bekker, Linda-Gail
    Lessells, Richard J.
    Ciaranello, Andrea L.
    Wood, Robin
    Losina, Elena
    Freedberg, Kenneth A.
    Kazemian, Pooyan
    Siedner, Mark J.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (02): : E120 - E129
  • [46] Mathematical modeling of two strains tuberculosis and COVID-19 vaccination model: a co-infection study with cost-effectiveness analysis
    Appiah, Raymond Fosu
    Jin, Zhen
    Yang, Junyuan
    Asamoah, Joshua Kiddy K.
    Wen, Yuqi
    FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2024, 10
  • [47] Use of anti-viral therapies in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in the United Arab Emirates: a cost-effectiveness and health-care resource use analysis
    Subhi, Ahmad
    El Shamy, Amin Mohamed
    Hussein, Saeed Abdullah Mohammed
    Jarrett, James
    Kozma, Sam
    Harfouche, Camille
    Al Dallal, Sara
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [48] Use of anti-viral therapies in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in the United Arab Emirates: a cost-effectiveness and health-care resource use analysis
    Ahmad Subhi
    Amin Mohamed El Shamy
    Saeed Abdullah Mohammed Hussein
    James Jarrett
    Sam Kozma
    Camille Harfouche
    Sara Al Dallal
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [49] Understanding Vaccine Perceptions and Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination: Opportunities to Strengthen Public Health Responses and COVID-19 Services for People Who Use Drugs
    Jordan, Ashly E.
    Izar, Rwaida
    Nicolas, Renee
    Beharie, Nisha
    Harocopos, Alex
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [50] Association Between the United States Department of Health and Human Services' COVID-19 Public Education Campaign and Initial Adult COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2020-2022
    Luchman, Joseph N.
    Nighbor, Tyler
    Kranzler, Elissa C.
    Denison, Benjamin
    Dahlen, Heather
    Kim, Jae-Eun C.
    Williams, Christopher
    Trigger, Sarah
    Bennett, Morgane
    Hoffman, Leah
    Peck, Joshua
    HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2024, 25 (04) : 602 - 611