The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization

被引:85
|
作者
Kohli, Michele [1 ]
Maschio, Michael [1 ]
Becker, Debbie [1 ]
Weinstein, Milton C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Quadrant Hlth Econ Inc, 92 Cottonwood Crescent, Cambridge, ON, Canada
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Coronavirus; COVID-19; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Economic analysis; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. Methods: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. Results: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. Conclusions: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained < $50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Cost-Effectiveness Framework for COVID-19 Treatments for Hospitalized Patients in the United States
    Daniel Sheinson
    Joseph Dang
    Anuj Shah
    Yang Meng
    David Elsea
    Stacey Kowal
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 1811 - 1831
  • [12] A Cost-Effectiveness Framework for COVID-19 Treatments for Hospitalized Patients in the United States
    Sheinson, Daniel
    Dang, Joseph
    Shah, Anuj
    Meng, Yang
    Elsea, David
    Kowal, Stacey
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (04) : 1811 - 1831
  • [13] ECONOMIC VALUE OF TREATMENT AND VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES TO ADDRESS THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS
    Padula, W.
    Malaviya, S.
    Reid, N.
    Chingcuanco, F.
    Ballreich, J.
    Tierce, J.
    Alexander, G. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S567 - S567
  • [14] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Strategies of COVID-19 Vaccination in Colombia: Comparison of High-Risk Prioritization and No Prioritization Strategies With the Absence of a Vaccination Plan
    Morales-Zamora, Gilberto
    Espinosa, Oscar
    Puertas, Edwin
    Fernandez, Juan Carlos
    Hernandez, Jose
    Zakzuk, Veronica
    Cepeda, Magda
    Alvis-Guzman, Nelson
    Castaneda-Orjuela, Carlos
    Paternina-Caicedo, Angel
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 31 : 101 - 110
  • [15] Public health and economic impact of COVID-19 vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, KP.2, among adults in 2024/2025 in the United States
    Yehoshua, Alon
    Di Fusco, Manuela
    Rudolph, Abby E.
    Thoburn, Elizabeth
    Lopez, Santiago M. C.
    Marczell, Kinga
    Yarnoff, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 27 (01) : 1569 - 1582
  • [16] Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib Compared With Standard of Care: A Modeling Study in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in the United States
    Ohsfeldt, Robert
    Kelton, Kari
    Klein, Tim
    Belger, Mark
    Mc Collam, Patrick L.
    Spiro, Theodore
    Burge, Russel
    Ahuja, Neera
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 43 (11) : 1877 - +
  • [17] The potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in the United States
    Kohli, Michele A.
    Maschio, Michael
    Joshi, Keya
    Lee, Amy
    Fust, Kelly
    Beck, Ekkehard
    van de Velde, Nicolas
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 1532 - 1545
  • [18] Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing Nuvaxovid to COVID-19 Vaccination in the United Kingdom: A Dynamic Transmission Model
    Pritchard, Clive
    Kutikova, Lucie
    Pitman, Richard
    Lai, Kira Zhi Hua
    Beyhaghi, Hadi
    Gibbons, Iiana
    Erbe, Amanda
    Zivkovic-Gojovic, Marija
    Cosgrove, Catherine
    Sculpher, Mark
    Salisbury, David
    VACCINES, 2025, 13 (02)
  • [19] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRODUCING NUVAXOVID TO COVID-19 VACCINATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: A DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION MODEL
    Pritchard, C.
    Kutikova, L.
    Pitman, R.
    Lai, K.
    Beyhaghi, H.
    Gibbons, I
    Erbe, A.
    Cosgrove, C.
    Sculpher, M.
    Salisbury, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12) : S74 - S74
  • [20] The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Kowal, Stacey
    Ng, Carmen D.
    Schuldt, Robert
    Sheinson, Daniel
    Cookson, Richard
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (02) : 216 - 225