The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization

被引:85
|
作者
Kohli, Michele [1 ]
Maschio, Michael [1 ]
Becker, Debbie [1 ]
Weinstein, Milton C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Quadrant Hlth Econ Inc, 92 Cottonwood Crescent, Cambridge, ON, Canada
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Coronavirus; COVID-19; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Economic analysis; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. Methods: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. Results: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. Conclusions: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained < $50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Health Economic Analysis for Oral Poliovirus Vaccine to Prevent COVID-19 in the United States
    Thompson, Kimberly M.
    Kalkowska, Dominika A.
    Badizadegan, Kamran
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 41 (02) : 376 - 386
  • [22] Modeling the potential public health and economic impact of different COVID-19 booster dose vaccination strategies with an adapted vaccine in the United Kingdom (vol 23, pg 730, 2024)
    Harrison, C.
    Butfield, R.
    Yarnoff, B.
    Yang, J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2024, 23 (01) : 911 - 913
  • [23] COVID-19 vaccination in Sindh Province, Pakistan: A modelling study of health impact and cost-effectiveness
    Pearson, Carl A. B.
    Bozzani, Fiammetta
    Procter, Simon R.
    Davies, Nicholas G.
    Huda, Maryam
    Jensen, Henning Tarp
    Keogh-Brown, Marcus
    Khalid, Muhammad
    Sweeney, Sedona
    Torres-Rueda, Sergio
    Eggo, Rosalind M.
    Vassall, Anna
    Jit, Mark
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (10)
  • [24] Economic Value of Vaccines to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Xiong, Xuechen
    Li, Jing
    Huang, Bo
    Tam, Tony
    Hong, Yingyi
    Chong, Ka-Chun
    Huo, Zhaohua
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [25] Indirect COVID-19 health effects and potential mitigating interventions: Cost-effectiveness framework
    Maya, Sigal
    Kahn, James G.
    Lin, Tracy K.
    Jacobs, Laurie M.
    Schmidt, Laura A.
    Burrough, William B.
    Ghasemzadeh, Rezvaneh
    Mousli, Leyla
    Allan, Matthew
    Donovan, Maya
    Barker, Erin
    Horvath, Hacsi
    Spetz, Joanne
    Brindis, Claire D.
    Malekinejad, Mohsen
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [26] REMDESIVIR USE IN HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS IN THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH CARE RESOURCE USE MODEL
    Subhi, A.
    El Shamy, Mohamed A.
    Hussein, S. A.
    Jarrett, J.
    Kozma, S.
    Harfouche, C.
    Ahmad, Sara M. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S403 - S403
  • [27] Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine use among the pediatric population of the United States
    Prasad, Namrata
    Stoecker, Charles
    Xing, Wei
    Cho, Bo-Hyun
    Leidner, Andrew J.
    Kobayashi, Miwako
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (18) : 2914 - 2921
  • [28] Public health impact and economic value of booster vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, bivalent (Original and Omicron BA.4/BA.5) in the United States
    Di Fusco, Manuela
    Marczell, Kinga
    Thoburn, Elizabeth
    Wiemken, Timothy. L. L.
    Yang, Jingyan
    Yarnoff, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 509 - 524
  • [29] Economic value of vaccines to address the COVID-19 pandemic: a US cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis
    Padula, William V.
    Malaviya, Shreena
    Reid, Natalie M.
    Cohen, Benjamin G.
    Chingcuanco, Francine
    Ballreich, Jeromie
    Tierce, Jonothan
    Alexander, G. Caleb
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) : 1060 - 1069
  • [30] Cost-Effectiveness of Combination of Baricitinib and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in the United States: A Modelling Study
    Kelton, Kari
    Klein, Tim
    Murphy, Dan
    Belger, Mark
    Hille, Erik
    McCollam, Patrick L.
    Spiro, Theodore
    Burge, Russel
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (01) : 562 - 582