The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization

被引:85
|
作者
Kohli, Michele [1 ]
Maschio, Michael [1 ]
Becker, Debbie [1 ]
Weinstein, Milton C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Quadrant Hlth Econ Inc, 92 Cottonwood Crescent, Cambridge, ON, Canada
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Coronavirus; COVID-19; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Economic analysis; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. Methods: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. Results: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. Conclusions: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained < $50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-Effectiveness of Combination of Baricitinib and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in the United States: A Modelling Study
    Kari Kelton
    Tim Klein
    Dan Murphy
    Mark Belger
    Erik Hille
    Patrick L. McCollam
    Theodore Spiro
    Russel Burge
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 562 - 582
  • [32] THE IMPACT OF FUNDING TOCILIZUMAB FOR THE INPATIENT TREATMENT OF COVID-19 IN THE UNITED STATES: A DISTRIBUTIONAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    Rosettie, K. L.
    Best, J.
    Kowal, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S93 - S93
  • [33] Projected COVID-19 epidemic in the United States in the context of the effectiveness of a potential vaccine and implications for social distancing and face mask use
    Shen, Mingwang
    Zu, Jian
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Pagan, Jose A.
    An, Li
    Du, Zhanwei
    Guo, Yuming
    Rong, Libin
    Xiao, Yanni
    Zhuang, Guihua
    Li, Yan
    Zhang, Lei
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (16) : 2295 - 2302
  • [34] COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, determinants of potential vaccination, and hesitancy in public: A call for effective health communication
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Bairwa, Mukesh
    Beniwal, Kalpana
    Kant, Ravi
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [35] Modelling the Potential Public Health Impact of Different COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies with an Adapted Vaccine in Singapore
    Thakkar, Karan
    Spinardi, Julia
    Kyaw, Moe H.
    Yang, Jingyan
    Mendoza, Carlos Fernando
    Ozbilgili, Egemen
    Taysi, Bulent
    Dodd, Josie
    Yarnoff, Ben
    Oh, Helen M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2024, 23 (01) : 16 - 26
  • [36] The (mis)uses of community: a critical analysis of public health communication for COVID-19 vaccination in the United States
    Sastry, Shaunak
    Siegenthaler, Bianca
    Mukherjee, Parameswari
    Raheem, Sabena Abdul
    Basu, Ambar
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (04) : 396 - 407
  • [37] The Potential Health Care Costs And Resource Use Associated With COVID-19 In The United States
    Bartsch, Sarah M.
    Ferguson, Marie C.
    McKinnell, James A.
    O'Shea, Kelly J.
    Wedlock, Patrick T.
    Siegmund, Sheryl S.
    Lee, Bruce Y.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (06) : 927 - 935
  • [38] AN ECONOMIC MODEL TO ESTIMATE THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINATION OF SENIORS WITH FLUZONE HIGH DOSE INFLUENZA VACCINE IN AUSTRALIA
    Largeron, N.
    Manton, A.
    Net, P.
    Choi, S.
    Becker, D. L.
    Bianic, F.
    Jacob, J.
    Maschio, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S65 - S65
  • [39] Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients at High Risk for Progression to Severe COVID-19 in the United States
    Carlson, Josh
    Foos, Volker
    Kasle, Adam
    Mugwagwa, Tendai
    Draica, Florin
    Wiemken, Timothy Lee
    Nguyen, Jennifer L.
    Cha-Silva, Ashley
    Migliaccio-Walle, Kristen
    Dzingina, Mendy
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (02) : 164 - 172
  • [40] The public health impact of COVID-19 variants of concern on the effectiveness of contact tracing in Vermont, United States
    Castonguay, Francois M.
    Borah, Brian F.
    Jeon, Seonghye
    Rainisch, Gabriel
    Kelso, Patsy
    Adhikari, Bishwa B.
    Daltry, Daniel J.
    Fischer, Leah S.
    Greening Jr, Bradford
    Kahn, Emily B.
    Kang, Gloria J.
    Meltzer, Martin I.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):