Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Novelli, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schuettig, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Spallek, Jacob [3 ]
Wachtler, Benjamin [4 ]
Diehl, Katharina [5 ]
Moor, Irene [6 ]
Richter, Matthias [6 ]
Dragano, Nico [7 ]
Sundmacher, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Hlth Econ, Munich, Germany
[3] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Publ Hlth, Senftenberg, Germany
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Publ Hlth Social & Prevent Med, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Inst Med Sociol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
organisation of health services; health policy; public health; social medicine; health economics; health services administration & management; MEDICAL-CARE; ACCESS; CHILDRENS; GERMANY; INCOME; MESO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Person-Centered Practice in the Portuguese Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Ventura, Filipa
    Costeira, Cristina R. B.
    Silva, Rosa
    Cardoso, Daniela
    Oliveira, Claudia
    NURSING REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01) : 235 - 244
  • [42] Social work leadership competencies in health and mental healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    Hussain, Amina
    Ashcroft, Rachelle
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [43] Public views on ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence: protocol for a scoping review
    Frost, Emma Kellie
    Bosward, Rebecca
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Carter, Stacy M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [44] Appraising Indigenous cultural safety within healthcare: Protocol of a scoping review of reviews
    Chakanyuka, Christina
    Bacsu, Juanita-Dawne R.
    Desroches, Andrea
    Walker, Jennifer
    O'connell, Megan E.
    Dame, Jessy
    Carrier, Leah
    Symenuk, Paisly
    Crowshoe, Lynden
    Bourque Bearskin, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 (01) : 294 - 299
  • [45] Potential social marketing applications for knowledge translation in healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Ellen, Moriah
    Brehaut, Jamie
    Weinreich, Nedra Kline
    Morvinski, Coby
    Zarshenas, Sareh
    Nguyen, Tram
    Presseau, Justin
    McCleary, Nicola
    Proctor, Enola
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [46] Beyond Oncology: Question Prompt Lists in Healthcare-A Scoping Review Protocol
    Lukasczik, Matthias
    Gerlich, Christian
    Wolf, Hans Dieter
    Vogel, Heiner
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2020, 3 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [47] Disaster management in rural and remote primary healthcare settings: a scoping review protocol
    Willson, Katie
    Lim, David
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [48] Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature
    Sinclair, Shane
    Norris, Jill M.
    McConnell, Shelagh J.
    Chochinov, Harvey Max
    Hack, Thomas F.
    Hagen, Neil A.
    McClement, Susan
    Bouchal, Shelley Raffin
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2016, 15
  • [49] Utilization of Robotics for Healthcare: A Scoping Review
    Javaid, Mohd
    Haleem, Abid
    Singh, Ravi Pratap
    Rab, Shanay
    Suman, Rajiv
    Kumar, Lalit
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT-INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2022,
  • [50] EEG Datasets for Healthcare: A Scoping Review
    Da Silva, Caroline Peres
    Tedesco, Salvatore
    O'Flynn, Brendan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 39186 - 39203