Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Novelli, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schuettig, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Spallek, Jacob [3 ]
Wachtler, Benjamin [4 ]
Diehl, Katharina [5 ]
Moor, Irene [6 ]
Richter, Matthias [6 ]
Dragano, Nico [7 ]
Sundmacher, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Hlth Econ, Munich, Germany
[3] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Publ Hlth, Senftenberg, Germany
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Publ Hlth Social & Prevent Med, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Inst Med Sociol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
organisation of health services; health policy; public health; social medicine; health economics; health services administration & management; MEDICAL-CARE; ACCESS; CHILDRENS; GERMANY; INCOME; MESO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Negative health impacts of navigating the healthcare system for musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review protocol
    Jessiman-Perreault, Genevieve
    Campbell, Paige
    Henley, Dawn
    Tribo, Danika
    Kania-Richmond, Ania
    Eubank, Breda H. F.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [12] Exploring the readiness of the Irish healthcare system to adopt advanced therapies: a scoping review protocol
    Devine, Isabella
    O'Brien, Clarice
    Mockler, David
    Kennedy, Cormac
    Hughes, Gerry
    Hennessy, Martina
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (7-8) : 439 - 444
  • [13] Informal coercion in inpatient mental healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    Bille, Vincent
    Lessard-Deschenes, Clara
    Sergerie-Richard, Sophie
    Desilets, Marie
    Tansey, Julie
    Goulet, Marie-Helene
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [14] Coproduction of healthcare service with immigrant patients: protocol of a scoping review
    Radl-Karimi, Christina
    Nicolaisen, Anne
    Sodemann, Morten
    Batalden, Paul
    von Plessen, Christian
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [15] Evaluations of healthcare delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol
    Roseleur, Jacqueline
    Partington, Andrew
    Karnon, Jonathan
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (01) : 128 - 134
  • [16] Protocol for a scoping review of the use of information and communication technology platforms for the delivery and utilisation of transgender healthcare
    Cui, Jialiang
    Prankumar, Sujith Kumar
    Wong, Horas Th
    Addo, Isaac Yeboah
    Tumwine, Christopher
    Noor, Muhammad Naveed
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06): : e055914
  • [17] Facilitators of and barriers to healthcare providers' adoption of harm reduction in cannabis use: a scoping review protocol
    Haddad, Roula
    Dagenais, Christian
    Huynh, Christophe
    Fallu, Jean-Sebastien
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [18] The Metaverse: A New Challenge for the Healthcare System: A Scoping Review
    Petrigna, Luca
    Musumeci, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2022, 7 (03)
  • [19] Near Miss Research in the Healthcare System A Scoping Review
    Feng, Ting-ting
    Zhang, Xin
    Tan, Ling-ling
    Liu, Di
    Dai, Li-cao
    Liu, Hua-ping
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 52 (03): : 160 - 166
  • [20] Robots in Healthcare: a Scoping Review
    Ahmed Ashraf Morgan
    Jordan Abdi
    Mohammed A. Q. Syed
    Ghita El Kohen
    Phillip Barlow
    Marcela P. Vizcaychipi
    Current Robotics Reports, 2022, 3 (4): : 271 - 280