Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Novelli, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schuettig, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Spallek, Jacob [3 ]
Wachtler, Benjamin [4 ]
Diehl, Katharina [5 ]
Moor, Irene [6 ]
Richter, Matthias [6 ]
Dragano, Nico [7 ]
Sundmacher, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Hlth Econ, Munich, Germany
[3] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Publ Hlth, Senftenberg, Germany
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Publ Hlth Social & Prevent Med, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Inst Med Sociol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
organisation of health services; health policy; public health; social medicine; health economics; health services administration & management; MEDICAL-CARE; ACCESS; CHILDRENS; GERMANY; INCOME; MESO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE USE OF HEALTHCARE NAVIGATORS IN RHEUMATIC DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW
    Carter, Alexandra
    Russell, Oscar
    Hill, Catherine
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 53 : 46 - 47
  • [32] Implementation and use of the Safewards model in healthcare services: A scoping review
    Ward-Stockham, Kristel
    Daniel, Catherine
    Bujalka, Helena
    Jarden, Rebecca J.
    Yap, Celene Y. L.
    Cochrane, Lindy
    Gerdtz, Marie Frances
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 33 (05) : 1242 - 1271
  • [33] The use of theories, frameworks, or models in knowledge translation studies in healthcare settings in China: a scoping review protocol
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Li, Xuejing
    Yan, Lijiao
    Yu, Yamei
    Hu, Jiale
    Li, Shelly-Anne
    Chen, Wenjun
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [34] The use of theories, frameworks, or models in knowledge translation studies in healthcare settings in China: a scoping review protocol
    Junqiang Zhao
    Xuejing Li
    Lijiao Yan
    Yamei Yu
    Jiale Hu
    Shelly-Anne Li
    Wenjun Chen
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [35] Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis
    Peng, XinXin
    Zhang, Jing Hua
    ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 80 (01)
  • [36] Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis
    XinXin Peng
    Jing Hua Zhang
    Archives of Public Health, 80
  • [37] Public views on ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence: protocol for a scoping review
    Emma Kellie Frost
    Rebecca Bosward
    Yves Saint James Aquino
    Annette Braunack-Mayer
    Stacy M. Carter
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [38] Barriers to access of healthcare services by the immigrant population in Scandinavia: a scoping review protocol
    Appoh, Lily
    Felix, Franca
    Pedersen, Preben Ulrich
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [39] Impact of group practices on patients, physicians and healthcare systems: protocol for a scoping review
    Zwiep, Terry M.
    Greenberg, Joshua A.
    Balaa, Fady
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    Musselman, Reilly P.
    Raiche, Isabelle
    Williams, Lara
    Moloo, Husein
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [40] Models of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    Costa, Daniela
    Cruz, Eduardo B.
    Rodrigues, Ana M.
    Goncalves-Bradley, Daniela
    Gomes, Luis A.
    Donato, Helena
    Nunes, Carla
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):