Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Novelli, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schuettig, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Spallek, Jacob [3 ]
Wachtler, Benjamin [4 ]
Diehl, Katharina [5 ]
Moor, Irene [6 ]
Richter, Matthias [6 ]
Dragano, Nico [7 ]
Sundmacher, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Hlth Econ, Munich, Germany
[3] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Publ Hlth, Senftenberg, Germany
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Publ Hlth Social & Prevent Med, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Inst Med Sociol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
organisation of health services; health policy; public health; social medicine; health economics; health services administration & management; MEDICAL-CARE; ACCESS; CHILDRENS; GERMANY; INCOME; MESO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An opportunity for transformative change in the US Healthcare System-cultural safety: a scoping review protocol
    Dickson, Tara
    Wilkinson, Tawna
    Dao, Kim D.
    Woodhouse, Linda J.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Gisselman, Angela Spontelli
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (03) : 243 - 251
  • [22] Racism in healthcare: a scoping review
    Sarah Hamed
    Hannah Bradby
    Beth Maina Ahlberg
    Suruchi Thapar-Björkert
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [23] Racism in healthcare: a scoping review
    Hamed, Sarah
    Bradby, Hannah
    Ahlberg, Beth Maina
    Thapar-Bjorkert, Suruchi
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] Children's and adolescents' experiences of healthcare professionals: scoping review protocol
    Davison, Gail
    Kelly, Martina Ann
    Thompson, Andrew
    Dornan, Tim
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [25] Uncovering the state of knowledge about healthcare gentrification: a scoping review protocol
    Suarez, Nataly R. Espinoza
    Loignon, Christine
    Dupere, Sophie
    Dufour, Isabelle
    Shareck, Martine
    Apparicio, Philippe
    Ouellet, Julie
    Pineault, Justine
    Amagnamoua, Simone
    Laferriere, Marie-Claude
    Wilson, Isabelle
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 6
  • [26] Patient safety culture in home healthcare centres: protocol for a scoping review
    Khorasgani, Abolfazl Etebarian
    Ghezeljeh, Tahereh Najafi
    Sharif-Nia, Hamid
    Farahani, Mansoureh Ashghali
    Golestan, Fateme
    Saraipour, Ferdos
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [27] Mapping Complex Interventions in Portuguese Healthcare Research: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Ventura, Filipa
    Araujo, Odete
    Casaleiro, Tiago
    Morgado, Tania
    Oliveira, Claudia
    NURSING REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01) : 142 - 151
  • [28] Children’s and adolescents’ experiences of healthcare professionals: scoping review protocol
    Gail Davison
    Martina Ann Kelly
    Andrew Thompson
    Tim Dornan
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [29] Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: protocol for a scoping review
    Stenberg, Marie
    Mangrio, Elisabeth
    Bengtsson, Mariette
    Carlson, Elisabeth
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [30] Characteristics of quality improvement interventions to improve physical healthcare in mental health settings: a scoping review protocol
    Hu, Di
    Stewart, Victoria
    Wheeler, Amanda J.
    Lau, Geoffrey
    Chapman, Justin
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 6