Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Novelli, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Schuettig, Wiebke [1 ,2 ]
Spallek, Jacob [3 ]
Wachtler, Benjamin [4 ]
Diehl, Katharina [5 ]
Moor, Irene [6 ]
Richter, Matthias [6 ]
Dragano, Nico [7 ]
Sundmacher, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Hlth Econ, Munich, Germany
[3] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Publ Hlth, Senftenberg, Germany
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim Inst Publ Hlth Social & Prevent Med, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fac, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Med Sociol, Halle, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Inst Med Sociol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
organisation of health services; health policy; public health; social medicine; health economics; health services administration & management; MEDICAL-CARE; ACCESS; CHILDRENS; GERMANY; INCOME; MESO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although the impact of macrolevel characteristics of health systems on socioeconomic inequity in health has been studied extensively, the impact of access characteristics on a smaller scale of health systems has received less attention. These mesolevel characteristics can influence access to healthcare and might have the potential to moderate or aggravate socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence of the association of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use and mesolevel access characteristics of the health system. Methods and analysis In conducting the scoping review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be carried out in four scientific databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO. Main eligibility criteria are inclusion in the analysis of a measure of socioeconomic position, a measure of individual healthcare use and a mesolevel determinant of access to healthcare services. The selection process consists of two consecutive screening stages (first: title/abstract; second: full text). At both stages, two reviewers independently assess the eligibility of studies. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be involved. Cohen's kappa will be calculated to report inter-rater agreement between reviewers. Results are synthesised narratively, as a high heterogeneity of studies is expected. Ethics and dissemination No primary data are collected for the presented scoping review. Therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The scoping review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented on national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use – results of a scoping review
    Philip Bammert
    Wiebke Schüttig
    Anna Novelli
    Iryna Iashchenko
    Jacob Spallek
    Miriam Blume
    Katharina Diehl
    Irene Moor
    Nico Dragano
    Leonie Sundmacher
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 23
  • [2] The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review
    Bammert, Philip
    Schuettig, Wiebke
    Novelli, Anna
    Iashchenko, Iryna
    Spallek, Jacob
    Blume, Miriam
    Diehl, Katharina
    Moor, Irene
    Dragano, Nico
    Sundmacher, Leonie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [3] Use of tabletop exercises for healthcare education: a scoping review protocol
    Fregeau, Amelie
    Cournoyer, Alexis
    Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-Andre
    Iseppon, Massimiliano
    Soucy, Nathalie
    St-Cyr Bourque, Julie
    Cossette, Sylvie
    Castonguay, Veronique
    Fleet, Richard
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [4] Use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: a scoping review protocol
    Kassie, Ayelign Mengesha
    Eakin, Elizabeth
    Abate, Biruk Beletew
    Endalamaw, Aklilu
    Zewdie, Anteneh
    Wolka, Eskinder
    Assefa, Yibeltal
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [5] Telehealth use in primary healthcare collaborative interprofessional practice: protocol for a scoping review
    Belber, Gisele Silvestre
    Vasconcelos, Raissa Ottes
    Fernandes Agreli, Heloise Lima
    Haddad, Ana Estela
    Peduzzi, Marina
    Leonello, Valeria Marli
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [6] Healthcare interventions for sex workers: protocol for a scoping review
    Hallett, Nutmeg
    Christie, Christine
    Docherty-Smith, Jack
    Welborn, Heather
    Wright, Hannah
    Molloy, Eleanor
    Chandan, Joht Singh
    Croxford, Sara
    Taylor, Julie
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [7] Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review
    Cranley, Lisa A.
    Cummings, Greta G.
    Profetto-McGrath, Joanne
    Toth, Ferenc
    Estabrooks, Carole A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [8] Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol
    Gerdtz, Marie
    Daniel, Catherine
    Jarden, Rebecca
    Kapp, Suzanne
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [9] Mapping the use of soft systems methodology for change management in healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    Augustsson, Hanna
    Churruca, Kate
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [10] Allocation of Financial Resources to Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Mahdiyan, Somayeh
    Rezayatmand, Reza
    Amini-Rarani, Mostafa
    Shaarbafchizadeh, Nasrin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 15