Safety-I, Safety-II and Resilience Engineering

被引:57
|
作者
Patterson, Mary [1 ]
Deutsch, Ellen S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Penn Patient Safety Author, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] ECRI Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
In the quest to continually improve the health care delivered to patients, it is important to understand "what went wrong," also known as Safety-I, when there are undesired outcomes, but it is also important to understand, and optimize "what went right," also known as Safety-II. The difference between Safety-I and Safety-II are philosophical as well as pragmatic. Improving health care delivery involves understanding that health care delivery is a complex adaptive system; components of that system impact, and are impacted by, the actions of other components of the system. Challenges to optimal care include regular, irregular and unexampled threats. This article addresses the dangers of brittleness and miscalibration, as well as the value of adaptive capacity and margin. These qualities can, respectively, detract from or contribute to the emergence of organizational resilience. Resilience is characterized by the ability to monitor, react, anticipate, and learn. Finally, this article celebrates the importance of humans, who make use of system capabilities and proactively mitigate the effects of system limitations to contribute to successful outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resilience in the Context of Nuclear Safety Engineering
    Yan, Rundong
    Tolo, Silvia
    Dunnett, Sarah
    Andrews, John
    Patelli, Edoardo
    2020 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2020), 2020,
  • [42] Resilient Health Care as the basis for teaching patient safety - A Safety-II critique of the World Health Organisation patient safety curriculum
    Sujan, Mark A.
    Furniss, Dominic
    Anderson, Janet
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Hollnagel, Erik
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 118 : 15 - 21
  • [43] Safety-II: Building safety capacity and aeronautical decision-making skills to commit better mistakes
    Lima Brugnara, R.
    de Andrade, D.
    de Souza Fontes, R.
    Soares Leao, M.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 127 (1310): : 511 - 536
  • [44] Safety-II: a systemic approach fur an effective clinical risk management
    Speer, Tillmann
    Muehlbradt, Thomas
    Fastner, Christian
    Schroeder, Stefan
    ANAESTHESIOLOGIE, 2023, 72 (01): : 48 - 56
  • [45] Applying Multi-source Data to Evaluate Pilots' Flight Safety Style Based on Safety-II Theory
    Wei, Zixin
    Zou, Ying
    Wang, Lei
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, EPCE 2023, PT I, 2023, 14017 : 320 - 330
  • [46] Safety I and safety II: the past and future of safety management
    Elliott, Jamie
    ERGONOMICS, 2016, 59 (06) : 859 - 860
  • [47] Resilience Engineering, Safety, and Implications for Pediatric Care
    Nemeth C.
    Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics, 2019, 5 (2) : 102 - 110
  • [48] Resilience Engineering - Safety Management in Complexes Environments
    Ferreira, Pedro
    SHO2010: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE, 2010, : 235 - 238
  • [49] Extracting Safety-II Factors From an Incident Reporting System by Text Analysis
    Abe, Takeru
    Sato, Hitoshi
    Nakamura, Kyota
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [50] Using Safety-II and resilient healthcare principles to learn from Never Events
    Anderson, Janet E.
    Watt, Alison J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 32 (03) : 196 - 203