Safety-I, Safety-II and Resilience Engineering

被引:57
|
作者
Patterson, Mary [1 ]
Deutsch, Ellen S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Penn Patient Safety Author, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] ECRI Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
In the quest to continually improve the health care delivered to patients, it is important to understand "what went wrong," also known as Safety-I, when there are undesired outcomes, but it is also important to understand, and optimize "what went right," also known as Safety-II. The difference between Safety-I and Safety-II are philosophical as well as pragmatic. Improving health care delivery involves understanding that health care delivery is a complex adaptive system; components of that system impact, and are impacted by, the actions of other components of the system. Challenges to optimal care include regular, irregular and unexampled threats. This article addresses the dangers of brittleness and miscalibration, as well as the value of adaptive capacity and margin. These qualities can, respectively, detract from or contribute to the emergence of organizational resilience. Resilience is characterized by the ability to monitor, react, anticipate, and learn. Finally, this article celebrates the importance of humans, who make use of system capabilities and proactively mitigate the effects of system limitations to contribute to successful outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety-I and Safety-II, the past and future of safety management
    Vanderhaegen, F.
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2015, 17 (03) : 461 - 464
  • [2] Erik Hollnagel: Safety-I and Safety-II, the past and future of safety management
    F. Vanderhaegen
    Cognition, Technology & Work, 2015, 17 : 461 - 464
  • [3] Integrating Safety-I and Safety-II conceptual frameworks to enhance safety measurement and management
    Lounsbury, Olivia
    Brant, Katelyn
    Stockwell, David C.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 128 - 130
  • [4] Cognitive Gap and Correlation of Safety-I and Safety-II: A Case of Maritime Shipping Safety Management
    Qiao, Weiliang
    Liu, Yang
    Ma, Xiaoxue
    Lan, He
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [5] Integrating Safety-I and Safety-II Approaches in Near Miss Management: A Critical Analysis
    De Leo, Federica
    Elia, Valerio
    Gnoni, Maria Grazia
    Tornese, Fabiana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [6] Integrating Safety-I and Safety-II: Learning from failure and success in construction sites
    Martins, Jessica Barros
    Carim, Guido, Jr.
    Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu
    Costella, Marcelo Fabiano
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 148
  • [7] Understanding procedural violations using Safety-I and Safety-II: The case of community pharmacies
    Jones, Christian E. L.
    Phipps, Denham L.
    Ashcroft, Darren M.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 105 : 114 - 120
  • [8] Safety-I, Safety-II and burnout: how complexity science can help clinician wellness
    Smaggus, Andrew
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (08) : 667 - 671
  • [9] Empirical study of gap and correlation between philosophies Safety-I and Safety-II: A case of Beijing taxi service system
    Wang, Feng
    Tian, Jin
    Lin, Zheying
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 82