Safety-I, Safety-II and Resilience Engineering

被引:57
|
作者
Patterson, Mary [1 ]
Deutsch, Ellen S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Penn Patient Safety Author, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] ECRI Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
In the quest to continually improve the health care delivered to patients, it is important to understand "what went wrong," also known as Safety-I, when there are undesired outcomes, but it is also important to understand, and optimize "what went right," also known as Safety-II. The difference between Safety-I and Safety-II are philosophical as well as pragmatic. Improving health care delivery involves understanding that health care delivery is a complex adaptive system; components of that system impact, and are impacted by, the actions of other components of the system. Challenges to optimal care include regular, irregular and unexampled threats. This article addresses the dangers of brittleness and miscalibration, as well as the value of adaptive capacity and margin. These qualities can, respectively, detract from or contribute to the emergence of organizational resilience. Resilience is characterized by the ability to monitor, react, anticipate, and learn. Finally, this article celebrates the importance of humans, who make use of system capabilities and proactively mitigate the effects of system limitations to contribute to successful outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 'Patient safety-II is een ontdekkingsreis'
    Bart Kiers
    Zorgvisie, 2018, 48 (11) : 40 - 42
  • [22] Safety-II in daily clinical practice
    Ratnitsky, Avital
    Havranek, Jennifer
    Mohr, Giulia Lara
    Ruether-Wolf, Katharina
    Schwendimann, Rene
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2021, 162 : 10 - 15
  • [23] Resilience and regulation, an odd couple? Consequences of Safety-II on governmental regulation of healthcare quality
    Leistikow, Ian
    Bal, Roland A.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (10) : 869 - 872
  • [24] Incorporating Safety-II in future gas systems
    Riemersma, Ben
    Correlje, Aad F.
    Kunneke, Rolf W.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 173
  • [25] Debrief it all: a tool for inclusion of Safety-II
    Bentley, Suzanne K.
    Mcnamara, Shannon
    Meguerdichian, Michael
    Walker, Katie
    Patterson, Mary
    Bajaj, Komal
    ADVANCES IN SIMULATION, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [26] On the Application of the Safety-II Concept in a Security Context
    Riana Steen
    European Journal for Security Research, 2019, 4 (2) : 175 - 200
  • [27] Safety through engaged workers: The link between Safety-II and work engagement
    Homann, Franziska
    Limbert, Caroline
    Bell, Nicholas
    Sykes, Peter
    Safety Science, 2022, 146
  • [28] The problem with making Safety-II work in healthcare
    Verhagen, Merel J.
    de Vos, Marit S.
    Sujan, Mark
    Hamming, Jaap F.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2022, 31 (05) : 402 - 408
  • [29] Debrief it all: a tool for inclusion of Safety-II
    Suzanne K. Bentley
    Shannon McNamara
    Michael Meguerdichian
    Katie Walker
    Mary Patterson
    Komal Bajaj
    Advances in Simulation, 6
  • [30] The Emperor has no clothes: A critique of Safety-II
    Cooper, M. D.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 152