Safety-I, Safety-II and Resilience Engineering

被引:57
|
作者
Patterson, Mary [1 ]
Deutsch, Ellen S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Penn Patient Safety Author, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] ECRI Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
In the quest to continually improve the health care delivered to patients, it is important to understand "what went wrong," also known as Safety-I, when there are undesired outcomes, but it is also important to understand, and optimize "what went right," also known as Safety-II. The difference between Safety-I and Safety-II are philosophical as well as pragmatic. Improving health care delivery involves understanding that health care delivery is a complex adaptive system; components of that system impact, and are impacted by, the actions of other components of the system. Challenges to optimal care include regular, irregular and unexampled threats. This article addresses the dangers of brittleness and miscalibration, as well as the value of adaptive capacity and margin. These qualities can, respectively, detract from or contribute to the emergence of organizational resilience. Resilience is characterized by the ability to monitor, react, anticipate, and learn. Finally, this article celebrates the importance of humans, who make use of system capabilities and proactively mitigate the effects of system limitations to contribute to successful outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety II professionals: How resilience engineering can transform safety practice
    Provan, David J.
    Woods, David D.
    Dekker, Sidney W. A.
    Rae, Andrew J.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 195
  • [32] Understanding and improving safety in artisanal fishing: A safety-II approach in raft fishing
    Werba Saldanha, Maria Christine
    Matos de Carvalho, Ricardo Jose
    Arcuri, Rodrigo
    Amorim, Ana Gabriella
    Rodriguez Vidal, Mario Cesar
    Rodrigues de Carvalho, Paulo Victor
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 122
  • [33] Safety-II and the study of healthcare safety routines: Two paths forward for research
    Rydenfalt, Christofer
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 27 (03): : 124 - 128
  • [34] Safety through engaged workers: The link between Safety-II and work engagement
    Homann, Franziska
    Limbert, Caroline
    Bell, Nicholas
    Sykes, Peter
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 146
  • [35] Safety-I/O-Module for harsh Environments
    不详
    ATP EDITION, 2009, (07): : 32 - 32
  • [36] What Works Well? A Safety-II Approach to Cybersecurity
    van Steen, Tommy
    Del-Real, Cristina
    van den Berg, Bibi
    AUGMENTED COGNITION, PT II, AC 2024, 2024, 14695 : 250 - 262
  • [37] Modeling Safety-II based on unexpected reactor trips
    Park, Jooyoung
    Kim, Ji-tae
    Lee, Sungheon
    Kim, Jonghyun
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2018, 115 : 280 - 293
  • [38] Safety I and Safety II
    Dekker, Sidney W. A.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 22 (04) : 239 - 240
  • [39] Advancing Occupational Safety and Health Training: A Safety-II Integration of the ADDIE Model for Virtual Reality
    Bentivenga, Rosina
    Bernabei, Margherita
    Carli, Marco
    Colabianchi, Silvia
    Costantino, Francesco
    Ferrarotti, Anna
    Neri, Michael
    Pietrafesa, Emma
    Sorrentino, Edvige
    Stabile, Sara
    METHODOLOGIES AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2024, 1171 : 313 - 324
  • [40] Understanding patient safety performance and educational needs using the 'Safety-II' approach for complex systems
    McNab, Duncan
    Bowie, Paul
    Morrison, Jill
    Ross, Alastair
    EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2016, 27 (06) : 443 - 450