Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning

被引:12
|
作者
Fradet, Guillaume [1 ]
Ayde, Reina [1 ]
Bottois, Hugo [1 ]
El Harchaoui, Mohamed [1 ]
Khaled, Wassef [2 ]
Drape, Jean-Luc [2 ]
Pilleul, Frank [3 ,4 ]
Bouhamama, Amine [3 ,4 ]
Beuf, Olivier [3 ]
Leporq, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Capgemini Engn, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Grp Hosp Cochin, AP HP Ctr, Serv Radiol B, Paris, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS,INSERM,UJM St Etienne,CREATIS UMR U1206 5220, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Ctr Lutte Canc Leon Berard, Dept Radiol, Lyon, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Deep learning; Soft tissue neoplasms;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. Methods Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. Results The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 +/- 0.11 (95% CI 0.65-1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 +/- 0.12 (95% CI 0.59-1) and 0.99 +/- 0.02 (95% CI 0.95-1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. Conclusions In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Analytical Comparison of the Behavior of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Stock Market Prediction
    Abdullah, Hasanen S.
    Ali, Nada Hussain
    Jassim, Ammar Hussein
    Hussain, Syed Hamid
    BAGHDAD SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2025, 22 (01)
  • [22] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [23] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [24] Development and Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Speech Audiometry Prediction
    Shin, Jae sung
    Ma, Jun
    Makara, Mao
    Sung, Nak-Jun
    Choi, Seong Jun
    Kim, Sung yeup
    Hong, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [25] Multimodality deep learning radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of malignancy of breast cancer: a multicenter study
    Wu, Peiyan
    Jiang, Yan
    Xing, Hanshuo
    Song, Wenbo
    Cui, Xinwu
    Wu, Xing Long
    Xu, Guoping
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (17):
  • [26] Machine Learning Based on MRI DWI Radiomics Features for Prognostic Prediction in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Hu, Qiyi
    Wang, Guojie
    Song, Xiaoyi
    Wan, Jingjing
    Li, Man
    Zhang, Fan
    Chen, Qingling
    Cao, Xiaoling
    Li, Shaolin
    Wang, Ying
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [27] Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Throughput Prediction
    Lee, Dongwon
    Lee, Joohyun
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS AND FUTURE NETWORKS (ICUFN 2021), 2021, : 452 - 454
  • [28] Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: Radiomics, machine learning and deep learning
    Kolossvary, Marton
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Feuchtner, Gudrun
    Maurovich-Horvat, Pal
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 13 (05) : 274 - 280
  • [29] Machine Learning for Applied Weather Prediction
    Haupt, Sue Ellen
    Cowie, Jim
    Linden, Seth
    McCandless, Tyler
    Kosovic, Branko
    Alessandrini, Stefano
    2018 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE (E-SCIENCE 2018), 2018, : 276 - 277
  • [30] TRANSFER LEARNING AND MACHINE LEARNING WITH MRI RADIOMICS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE DIAGNOSIS
    Hashem, Esraa Mamdouh
    Salem, Dina Ahmed
    2024 41ST NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE, NRSC 2024, 2024, : 243 - 251