Development and Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Speech Audiometry Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Shin, Jae sung [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Makara, Mao [1 ]
Sung, Nak-Jun [2 ]
Choi, Seong Jun [3 ]
Kim, Sung yeup [4 ]
Hong, Min [5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Software Convergence, Asan 31538, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Goyang 10245, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Cheonan Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Cheonan 31151, South Korea
[4] Soonchunhyang Univ, Insitute Artificial Intelligence & Software, Asan 31538, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Comp Software Engn, Asan 31538, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
speech audiometry; pure-tone audiometry; multilayer perceptron; recurrent neural network; gradient boosting; XGBoost; regression analysis in audiology; deep learning; machine learning; hearing assessment; PURE-TONE AUDIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/app15063071
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Hearing loss significantly impacts daily communication, making accurate speech audiometry (SA) assessment essential for diagnosis and treatment. However, SA testing is time-consuming and resource-intensive, limiting its accessibility in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a multi-class classification model that predicts SA results using pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data, enabling a more efficient and automated assessment. To achieve this, we implemented and compared MLP, RNN, gradient boosting, and XGBoost models, evaluating their performance using accuracy, F1 score, log loss, and confusion matrix analysis. Experimental results showed that gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy, 86.22%, while XGBoost demonstrated a more balanced classification performance. The MLP achieved 85.77% and the RNN achieved 85.41%, exhibiting relatively low accuracy, with the RNN showing limitations due to the low temporal dependency of PTA data. Additionally, all models faced challenges predicting class 2 (borderline hearing levels) due to overlapping data distributions. These findings suggest that machine learning models, particularly gradient boosting and XGBoost, outperform deep learning models in SA prediction. Future research should focus on feature engineering, hyperparameter optimization, and ensemble approaches to enhance performance and validate real-world applicability. The proposed model could contribute to automating SA prediction and improving hearing assessment efficiency and patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction
    Guo, Wenjing
    Liu, Jie
    Dong, Fan
    Song, Meng
    Li, Zoe
    Khan, Md Kamrul Hasan
    Patterson, Tucker A.
    Hong, Huixiao
    EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 248 (21) : 1952 - 1973
  • [2] Explainable artificial intelligence for stroke prediction through comparison of deep learning and machine learning models
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Afshari, Lida
    Moulaei, Reza
    Sabet, Babak
    Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad
    Afrash, Mohammad Reza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] Development of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Speech Audiometry Using Pure-Tone Audiometry Data
    Shin, Jae Sung
    Ma, Jun
    Choi, Seong Jun
    Kim, Sungyeup
    Hong, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (20):
  • [4] Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models: A Review
    Aljameel, Sumayh S.
    Alzahrani, Manar
    Almusharraf, Reem
    Altukhais, Majd
    Alshaia, Sadeem
    Sahlouli, Hanan
    Aslam, Nida
    Khan, Irfan Ullah
    Alabbad, Dina A.
    Alsumayt, Albandari
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [5] Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models
    Teshome, Fitsum T.
    Bayabil, Haimanote K.
    Schaffer, Bruce
    Ampatzidis, Yiannis
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, 226
  • [6] Wind Power Prediction Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Tarek, Zahraa
    Shams, Mahmoud Y.
    Elshewey, Ahmed M.
    El-kenawy, El-Sayed M.
    Ibrahim, Abdelhameed
    Abdelhamid, Abdelaziz A.
    El-dosuky, Mohamed A.
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 74 (01): : 715 - 732
  • [7] Validating the validation: reanalyzing a large-scale comparison of deep learning and machine learning models for bioactivity prediction
    Robinson, Matthew C.
    Glen, Robert C.
    Lee, Alpha A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (07) : 717 - 730
  • [8] Validating the validation: reanalyzing a large-scale comparison of deep learning and machine learning models for bioactivity prediction
    Matthew C. Robinson
    Robert C. Glen
    Alpha A. Lee
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 717 - 730
  • [9] Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Diabetes Prediction
    Cihan, Pinar
    Coskun, Hakan
    29TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS (SIU 2021), 2021,
  • [10] Machine Learning Models Comparison for Bitcoin Price Prediction
    Phaladisailoed, Thearasak
    Numnonda, Thanisa
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICITEE), 2018, : 506 - 511