Development and Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Speech Audiometry Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Shin, Jae sung [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Makara, Mao [1 ]
Sung, Nak-Jun [2 ]
Choi, Seong Jun [3 ]
Kim, Sung yeup [4 ]
Hong, Min [5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Software Convergence, Asan 31538, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Goyang 10245, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Cheonan Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Cheonan 31151, South Korea
[4] Soonchunhyang Univ, Insitute Artificial Intelligence & Software, Asan 31538, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Comp Software Engn, Asan 31538, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
speech audiometry; pure-tone audiometry; multilayer perceptron; recurrent neural network; gradient boosting; XGBoost; regression analysis in audiology; deep learning; machine learning; hearing assessment; PURE-TONE AUDIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/app15063071
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Hearing loss significantly impacts daily communication, making accurate speech audiometry (SA) assessment essential for diagnosis and treatment. However, SA testing is time-consuming and resource-intensive, limiting its accessibility in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a multi-class classification model that predicts SA results using pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data, enabling a more efficient and automated assessment. To achieve this, we implemented and compared MLP, RNN, gradient boosting, and XGBoost models, evaluating their performance using accuracy, F1 score, log loss, and confusion matrix analysis. Experimental results showed that gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy, 86.22%, while XGBoost demonstrated a more balanced classification performance. The MLP achieved 85.77% and the RNN achieved 85.41%, exhibiting relatively low accuracy, with the RNN showing limitations due to the low temporal dependency of PTA data. Additionally, all models faced challenges predicting class 2 (borderline hearing levels) due to overlapping data distributions. These findings suggest that machine learning models, particularly gradient boosting and XGBoost, outperform deep learning models in SA prediction. Future research should focus on feature engineering, hyperparameter optimization, and ensemble approaches to enhance performance and validate real-world applicability. The proposed model could contribute to automating SA prediction and improving hearing assessment efficiency and patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of machine learning models for seizure prediction in hospitalized patients
    Struck, Aaron F.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Andres A.
    Osman, Gamaledin
    Gilmore, Emily J.
    Haider, Hiba A.
    Dhakar, Monica B.
    Schrettner, Matthew
    Lee, Jong W.
    Gaspard, Nicolas
    Hirsch, Lawrence J.
    Westover, M. Brandon
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2019, 6 (07): : 1239 - 1247
  • [42] Comparison of Radiomic Machine Learning and Deep Learning Survival Models in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Ramu, Shivabalan Kathavarayan
    Byale, Anjali
    Singh, Achintya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S931 - S931
  • [43] Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between machine learning and deep learning models
    Skattebol, L.
    Stromstad, M.
    Leonardsen, E. H.
    Kaufmann, T.
    Moridi, T.
    Stawiarz, L.
    Ouellette, R.
    Ineichen, B. V.
    Ferreira, D.
    Muehlboeck, S.
    Brune, S.
    Nygaard, G. O.
    Berg-Hansen, P.
    Beyer, M. K.
    Sowa, P.
    Manouchehrinia, A.
    Westman, E.
    Beck, D.
    Olsson, T.
    Celius, E. G.
    Hillert, J.
    Kockum, I.
    Harbo, H. F.
    Piehl, F.
    Granberg, T.
    Westlye, L. T.
    Hogestol, E. A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (3_SUPPL) : 25 - 26
  • [44] Empirical Forecasting Analysis of Bitcoin Prices: A Comparison of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Ensemble Learning Models
    Tripathy, Nrusingha
    Hota, Sarbeswara
    Mishra, Debahuti
    Satapathy, Pranati
    Nayak, Subrat Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2024, 15 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [45] A Quest for Context-Specific Stock Price Prediction: A Comparison Between Time Series, Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Mugdha Shailendra Kulkarni
    S. Vijayakumar Bharathi
    Arif Perdana
    Divisha Kilari
    SN Computer Science, 6 (4)
  • [46] Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Smoking Cessation Outcome
    Lai, Cheng-Chien
    Huang, Wei-Hsin
    Chang, Betty Chia-Chen
    Hwang, Lee-Ching
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (05) : 1 - 10
  • [47] Frost prediction using machine learning and deep neural network models
    Talsma, Carl J.
    Solander, Kurt C.
    Mudunuru, Maruti K.
    Crawford, Brandon
    Powell, Michelle R.
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5
  • [48] Deep Graph Machine Learning Models for Epidemic Spread Prediction and Prevention
    Salis, Charalampos
    Papakonstantinopoulou, Katia
    COMPLEX NETWORKS XV, COMPLENET 2024, 2024, : 151 - 163
  • [49] Stock Price Prediction Using Time Series, Econometric, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models
    Chatterjee, Ananda
    Bhowmick, Hrisav
    Sen, Jaydip
    2021 IEEE Mysore Sub Section International Conference, MysuruCon 2021, 2021, : 289 - 296
  • [50] Prediction of Acceleration Amplification Ratio of Rocking Foundations Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Gajan, Sivapalan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (23):