Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning

被引:12
|
作者
Fradet, Guillaume [1 ]
Ayde, Reina [1 ]
Bottois, Hugo [1 ]
El Harchaoui, Mohamed [1 ]
Khaled, Wassef [2 ]
Drape, Jean-Luc [2 ]
Pilleul, Frank [3 ,4 ]
Bouhamama, Amine [3 ,4 ]
Beuf, Olivier [3 ]
Leporq, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Capgemini Engn, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Grp Hosp Cochin, AP HP Ctr, Serv Radiol B, Paris, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS,INSERM,UJM St Etienne,CREATIS UMR U1206 5220, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Ctr Lutte Canc Leon Berard, Dept Radiol, Lyon, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Deep learning; Soft tissue neoplasms;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. Methods Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. Results The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 +/- 0.11 (95% CI 0.65-1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 +/- 0.12 (95% CI 0.59-1) and 0.99 +/- 0.02 (95% CI 0.95-1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. Conclusions In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods
    Wang, Xinhui
    Wan, Qi
    Chen, Houjin
    Li, Yanfeng
    Li, Xinchun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (08) : 4595 - 4605
  • [42] Comparison of MRI Sequences to Predict ATRX Status Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning
    Mora, Nabila Gala Nacul
    Akkurt, Burak Han
    Kasap, Dilek
    Bloemer, David
    Heindel, Walter
    Mannil, Manoj
    Musigmann, Manfred
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (13)
  • [43] Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods
    Xinhui Wang
    Qi Wan
    Houjin Chen
    Yanfeng Li
    Xinchun Li
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 4595 - 4605
  • [44] Deep Neural Networks and Machine Learning Radiomics Modelling for Prediction of Relapse in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
    Lisson, Catharina Silvia
    Lisson, Christoph Gerhard
    Mezger, Marc Fabian
    Wolf, Daniel
    Schmidt, Stefan Andreas
    Thaiss, Wolfgang M.
    Tausch, Eugen
    Beer, Ambros J.
    Stilgenbauer, Stephan
    Beer, Meinrad
    Goetz, Michael
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [45] Machine and Deep Learning Based Radiomics Models for Preoperative Prediction of Benign and Malignant Sacral Tumors
    Yin, Ping
    Mao, Ning
    Chen, Hao
    Sun, Chao
    Wang, Sicong
    Liu, Xia
    Hong, Nan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [46] Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI
    Bertelli, Elena
    Mercatelli, Laura
    Marzi, Chiara
    Pachetti, Eva
    Baccini, Michela
    Barucci, Andrea
    Colantonio, Sara
    Gherardini, Luca
    Lattavo, Lorenzo
    Pascali, Maria Antonietta
    Agostini, Simone
    Miele, Vittorio
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [47] Comparison of MRI and CT based deep learning radiomics analyses and their combination for diagnosing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Cheng, Ming
    Zhang, Hanyue
    Guo, Yimin
    Lyu, Peijie
    Yan, Jing
    Liu, Yin
    Liang, Pan
    Ren, Zhigang
    Gao, Jianbo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [48] Stock price prediction using DEEP learning algorithm and its comparison with machine learning algorithms
    Nikou, Mahla
    Mansourfar, Gholamreza
    Bagherzadeh, Jamshid
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (04): : 164 - 174
  • [49] Explainable artificial intelligence for stroke prediction through comparison of deep learning and machine learning models
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Afshari, Lida
    Moulaei, Reza
    Sabet, Babak
    Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad
    Afrash, Mohammad Reza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between machine learning and deep learning models
    Skattebol, L.
    Stromstad, M.
    Leonardsen, E. H.
    Kaufmann, T.
    Moridi, T.
    Stawiarz, L.
    Ouellette, R.
    Ineichen, B. V.
    Ferreira, D.
    Muehlboeck, S.
    Brune, S.
    Nygaard, G. O.
    Berg-Hansen, P.
    Beyer, M. K.
    Sowa, P.
    Manouchehrinia, A.
    Westman, E.
    Beck, D.
    Olsson, T.
    Celius, E. G.
    Hillert, J.
    Kockum, I.
    Harbo, H. F.
    Piehl, F.
    Granberg, T.
    Westlye, L. T.
    Hogestol, E. A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (3_SUPPL) : 25 - 26