Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning

被引:12
|
作者
Fradet, Guillaume [1 ]
Ayde, Reina [1 ]
Bottois, Hugo [1 ]
El Harchaoui, Mohamed [1 ]
Khaled, Wassef [2 ]
Drape, Jean-Luc [2 ]
Pilleul, Frank [3 ,4 ]
Bouhamama, Amine [3 ,4 ]
Beuf, Olivier [3 ]
Leporq, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Capgemini Engn, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Grp Hosp Cochin, AP HP Ctr, Serv Radiol B, Paris, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS,INSERM,UJM St Etienne,CREATIS UMR U1206 5220, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Ctr Lutte Canc Leon Berard, Dept Radiol, Lyon, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Deep learning; Soft tissue neoplasms;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. Methods Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. Results The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 +/- 0.11 (95% CI 0.65-1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 +/- 0.12 (95% CI 0.59-1) and 0.99 +/- 0.02 (95% CI 0.95-1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. Conclusions In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine (Deep) Learning Methods for Image Processing and Radiomics
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Parmar, Chintan
    Qi, Jinyi
    El Naqa, Issam
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 3 (02) : 104 - 108
  • [32] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques in promoter prediction across diverse species
    Bhandari, Nikita
    Khare, Satyajeet
    Walambe, Rahee
    Kotecha, Ketan
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
  • [33] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques in promoter prediction across diverse species
    Bhandari N.
    Khare S.
    Walambe R.
    Kotecha K.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2021, 7 : 1 - 17
  • [34] MRI Radiomics of Breast Cancer: Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion Status
    Kayadibi, Yasemin
    Kocak, Burak
    Ucar, Nese
    Akan, Yesim Namdar
    Yildirim, Emine
    Bektas, Sibel
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S126 - S134
  • [35] MRI Radiomics and Machine Learning for the Prediction of Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score in Invasive Breast Cancer
    Romeo, Valeria
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Sanduzzi, Luca
    Carpentiero, Vincenzo
    Caruso, Martina
    Lama, Beatrice
    Garifalos, Dimitri
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Maurea, Simone
    Brunetti, Arturo
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [36] Time-dependent machine learning survival prediction model of brain metastases with MRI radiomics
    Crete, S. J. C.
    Campbell, N. B.
    Hu, R.
    Peoples, J.
    Yan, M.
    Olding, T.
    Tyryshkin, K.
    Simpson, A. L.
    de Moraes, F. Ynoe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S565 - S566
  • [37] COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL MACHINE LEARNING & DEEP LEARNING TO CHARACTERISE FIBROSIS & INFLAMMATION USING QUANTITATIVE MRI
    Chan, Emily
    Kelly, Matt
    Schnabel, Julia A.
    2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2021, : 729 - 732
  • [38] Deep Learning and Habitat Radiomics for the Prediction of Glioma Pathology Using Multiparametric MRI: A Multicenter Study
    Zhu, Yunyang
    Wang, Jing
    Xue, Chen
    Zhai, Xiaoyang
    Xiao, Chaoyong
    Lu, Ting
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 32 (02) : 963 - 975
  • [39] Artificial intelligence on MRI for molecular subtyping of diffuse gliomas: feature comparison, visualization, and correlation between radiomics and deep learning
    Zijian Zhou
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 745 - 746
  • [40] Artificial intelligence on MRI for molecular subtyping of diffuse gliomas: feature comparison, visualization, and correlation between radiomics and deep learning
    Zhou, Zijian
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 745 - 746