Balanced left ventricular myocardial SSFP-tagging at 1.5T and 3T

被引:10
|
作者
Markl, M. [1 ]
Scherer, S. [1 ]
Frydrychowicz, A. [1 ]
Burger, D. [1 ]
Geibel, A. [2 ]
Hennig, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Univ Hosp, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, Univ Hosp, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
tagging; SSFP; myocardial motion; cardiac MRI; 3; Tesla;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.21674
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of steady-state free precession (SSFP)-tagging at 1.5T and 3T and to define the ideal settings with respect to optimized tag contrast throughout the cardiac cycle for both field strengths. To identify optimal imaging parameters data acquisition was repeated for different flip angles. Left ventricular tag-tissue contrast, tag fading times, tag persistence, and myocardial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were quantified in basal, mid-ventricular, and apical slice locations. To assess the effect of field strength on image quality and artifact level, additional semiquantitative image grading was performed by two experienced readers. SSFP-tagging at 3T proved superior to 1.5T and provided significantly enhanced tag persistence and myocardial SNR while maintaining overall image quality and artifact level. The definition of a tag quality index demonstrated optimal SSFP-tagging performance for a flip angle of 20 degrees. Diastolic tag visibility was improved at 3T and resulted in enhanced average tag persistence of 789 +/- 128 ms compared to 523 +/- 40 ms at 1.5T. For SSFP-tagging at 3T the combination of T-1 lengthening and superior myocardial SNR is highly promising and has the potential to improve the depiction of tagged myocardial function throughout the entire cardiac cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 639
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Strengths and Weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS Data in Brain Glioma Classification
    Kounelakis, M. G.
    Dimou, I. N.
    Zervakis, M. E.
    Tsougos, I.
    Tsolaki, E.
    Kousi, E.
    Kapsalaki, E.
    Theodorou, K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 15 (04): : 647 - 654
  • [32] What you Need to Know About MR Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Tanenbaum, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [33] 7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5T
    Obusez, Emmanuel C.
    Lowe, Mark
    Oh, Se-Hong
    Wang, Irene
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Ruggieri, Paul
    Hill, Virginia
    Lockwood, Daniel
    Emch, Todd
    Moon, Doksu
    Loy, Gareth
    Lee, Jonathan
    Kiczek, Matthew
    Massand, Manoj
    Statsevych, Volodymyr
    Stultz, Todd
    Jones, Stephen E.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 459 - 476
  • [34] Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteersReference values and clinical implications
    Marcel Granitz
    Lukas J. Motloch
    Christina Granitz
    Matthias Meissnitzer
    Wolfgang Hitzl
    Klaus Hergan
    Alexander Schlattau
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2019, 131 : 143 - 155
  • [35] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Sormaala, Markus J.
    Ruohola, Juha-Petri
    Mattila, Ville M.
    Koskinen, Seppo K.
    Pihlajamaki, Harri K.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
  • [36] MR Diagnosis of Bone Metastases at 1.5T and 3T: Can STIR Imaging Be Omitted?
    Ohlmann-Knafo, S.
    Tarnoki, A. D.
    Tarnoki, D. L.
    Pickuth, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 924 - 932
  • [37] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Markus J Sormaala
    Juha-Petri Ruohola
    Ville M Mattila
    Seppo K Koskinen
    Harri K Pihlajamäki
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12
  • [38] 3D imaging of the whole spine at 3T compared to 1.5T: Initial experiences
    Rodegerdts, EA
    Boss, A
    Riemarzik, K
    Lichy, M
    Schick, F
    Claussen, CD
    Schlemmer, HP
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (05) : 488 - 493
  • [39] 1.5T versus 3T MRI for targeting subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation
    Cheng, Cheng-Hsin
    Huang, Hsing-Ming
    Lin, Hung-Lin
    Chiou, Shang-Ming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 467 - 470
  • [40] 3T和1.5T软骨成像的初步动物实验研究
    李勇刚
    放射学实践, 2005, (05) : 426 - 426