Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot

被引:24
|
作者
Sormaala, Markus J. [1 ,3 ]
Ruohola, Juha-Petri [1 ]
Mattila, Ville M. [1 ,2 ]
Koskinen, Seppo K. [3 ]
Pihlajamaki, Harri K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Mil Med, Res Dept, FIN-00301 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Trauma, Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
RESOLUTION MRI; FRACTURES; INJURIES; ANKLE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-12-128
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Bone stress injuries are common in athletes and military recruits. Only a minority of bone stress changes are available on plain radiographs. Acute bone stress is often visible on MRI as bone marrow edema, which is also seen in many other disease processes such as malignancies, inflammatory conditions and infections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of radiographs, 1.5T and 3T MRI to identify acute bone marrow changes in the foot. Methods: Ten patients with 12 stress fractures seen on plain radiographs underwent MRI using 1.5T and 3T scanners. T1 FSE and STIR axial, sagittal, and coronal view sequences were obtained. Two musculoskeletal radiologists interpreted the images independently and by consensus in case of disagreement. Results: Of the 63 acute bone stress changes seen on 3T images, 61 were also seen on 1.5T images. The sensitivity of 1.5T MRI was 97% (95% CI: 89%-99%) compared with 3T. The 3T MRI images where, therefore, at least equally sensitive to 1.5T scanners in detection of bone marrow edema. On T1-weighted sequences, 3T images were slightly superior to 1.5T images in visualizing the demarcation of the edema and bone trabeculae. The kappa-value for inter-observer variability was 0.86 in the MRI indicating substantial interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Owing to slightly better resolution of 3T images, edema characterization is easier, which might aid in the differential diagnosis of the bone marrow edema. There was, however, no noteworthy difference in the sensitivity of the 1.5T and 3T images to bone marrow edema. Routine identification of acute bone stress changes and suspected stress injuries can, therefore, be made with 1.5T field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Markus J Sormaala
    Juha-Petri Ruohola
    Ville M Mattila
    Seppo K Koskinen
    Harri K Pihlajamäki
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12
  • [2] A comparison of liver fat fraction measurement on MRI at 3T and 1.5T
    Athithan, Lavanya
    Gulsin, Gaurav S.
    House, Michael J.
    Pang, Wenjie
    Brady, Emer M.
    Wormleighton, Joanne
    Parke, Kelly S.
    Graham-Brown, Matthew
    St Pierre, Tim G.
    Levelt, Eylem
    McCann, Gerry P.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [3] Electromagnetic Exposure of Personnel Involved in Cardiac MRI Examinations in 1.5T, 3T and 7T Scanners
    Sklinda, Katarzyna
    Karpowicz, Jolanta
    Stepniewski, Andrzej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [4] Quantification of 3D Geometric Distortion for 1.5T and 3T MRI Scanners Used for Radiation Therapy
    Stowe, M.
    Gupta, N.
    Raterman, B.
    Lu, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3662 - 3662
  • [5] Carotid MRI Detection of Intraplaque Hemorrhage at 3T and 1.5T
    McNally, J. Scott
    Yoon, Hyo-Chun
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Narra, Krishna K.
    McLaughlin, Michael S.
    Parker, Dennis L.
    Treiman, Gerald S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2015, 25 (03) : 390 - 396
  • [6] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T in assessment of suspicious breast lesions
    Ragupathy, S. K. Arcot
    Gagliardi, T.
    Redpath, T. W.
    Flynn, S.
    Jagpal, B.
    Begley, J. K. P.
    Gilbert, F. J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12
  • [7] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T in assessment of suspicious breast lesions
    SK Arcot Ragupathy
    T Gagliardi
    TW Redpath
    S Flynn
    B Jagpal
    JKP Begley
    FJ Gilbert
    Breast Cancer Research, 12
  • [8] Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot
    Bolen, Geraldine
    Audigie, Fabrice
    Spriet, Mathieu
    Vandenberghe, Filip
    Busoni, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2010, 30 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [9] Quantitative DCEMRI of the Breast at 1.5T and 3T
    Pineda, F.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M.
    Newstead, G.
    Abe, H.
    Sennett, C.
    Karczmar, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [10] Wireless video transmission into the MRI magnet room: implementation and evaluation at 1.5T, 3T and 7T
    Hensen, Bennet
    Kaegebein, Urte
    Gutberlet, Marcel
    Ringe, Kristina, I
    Van Dai Vo-Chieu
    Stucht, Daniel
    Speck, Oliver
    Vick, Ralf
    Wacker, Frank
    Pannicke, Enrico
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2019, 64 (04): : 373 - 382