Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot

被引:9
|
作者
Bolen, Geraldine [1 ]
Audigie, Fabrice [2 ]
Spriet, Mathieu [3 ]
Vandenberghe, Filip [4 ]
Busoni, Valeria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Dept Compan Anim & Equidae, Med Imaging Sect, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Natl Vet Sch Alfort, Goustranville, France
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Referral Hosp Horses & Small Anim, Dierenklin Bosdreef, Moerbeke Wass, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Horses; Foot; Magnetic field; Low-field; High-field; DISTAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDON; LOW-FIELD MRI; COLLATERAL LIGAMENTS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; PODOTROCHLEAR APPARATUS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; HORSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jevs.2009.11.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in the investigation of foot pain in horses. The aim of this study was to qualitatively compare ex-vivo MR images of the same equine feet obtained at three magnetic field strengths: 0.27, 1.5, and 3 tesla (T). Ten cadaver feet were used. All feet were imaged with two high-field systems (3T, 1.5T) and with a low-field (LF) system at 0.27 T designed for standing horses. Images were acquired using similar pulse sequences in all 3 MR units. MR images were subjectively evaluated by three independent experienced image analysts for image quality and clarity of visualization of individual anatomical structures using a four-point grading scale. The images from all of the examinations were considered to be of diagnostic value except for the hoof capsule where substantial artifacts were present in LF images with distortion and loss of signal at the dorsal/distal aspect of the hoof capsule in LF images. Anatomical structure scoring values of images obtained at 3T and 1.5T were significantly greater than scores of images obtained at 0.27T. Scores for images obtained at 3T were significantly higher than those for images obtained at 1.5T. Mean score differences between 1.5T and 3T were higher for cartilage of the distal interphalangeal joint and for the ungular cartilages.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 20
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Sormaala, Markus J.
    Ruohola, Juha-Petri
    Mattila, Ville M.
    Koskinen, Seppo K.
    Pihlajamaki, Harri K.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
  • [2] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot
    Markus J Sormaala
    Juha-Petri Ruohola
    Ville M Mattila
    Seppo K Koskinen
    Harri K Pihlajamäki
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12
  • [3] Specific absorption rate in neonates undergoing magnetic resonance procedures at 1.5T and 3T
    Malik, Shaihan J.
    Beqiri, Arian
    Price, Anthony N.
    Teixeira, Jose Nuno
    Hand, Jeffrey W.
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 28 (03) : 344 - 352
  • [4] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T in assessment of suspicious breast lesions
    Ragupathy, S. K. Arcot
    Gagliardi, T.
    Redpath, T. W.
    Flynn, S.
    Jagpal, B.
    Begley, J. K. P.
    Gilbert, F. J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12
  • [5] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T in assessment of suspicious breast lesions
    SK Arcot Ragupathy
    T Gagliardi
    TW Redpath
    S Flynn
    B Jagpal
    JKP Begley
    FJ Gilbert
    Breast Cancer Research, 12
  • [6] Quantitative DCEMRI of the Breast at 1.5T and 3T
    Pineda, F.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M.
    Newstead, G.
    Abe, H.
    Sennett, C.
    Karczmar, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [7] Clinical 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain metastases at 1.5T and 3T
    Sjobakk, TE
    Lundgren, S
    Kristoffersen, A
    Singstad, T
    Svarliaunet, AJ
    Sonnewald, U
    Gribbestad, IS
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (05) : 501 - 508
  • [8] A comparison of liver fat fraction measurement on MRI at 3T and 1.5T
    Athithan, Lavanya
    Gulsin, Gaurav S.
    House, Michael J.
    Pang, Wenjie
    Brady, Emer M.
    Wormleighton, Joanne
    Parke, Kelly S.
    Graham-Brown, Matthew
    St Pierre, Tim G.
    Levelt, Eylem
    McCann, Gerry P.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [9] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2*at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Alam, Mohammed H.
    Auger, Dominique
    Smith, Gillian C.
    He, Taigang
    Vassiliou, Vassilis
    Baksi, A. John
    Wage, Rick
    Drivas, Peter
    Feng, Yanqiu
    Firmin, David N.
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17
  • [10] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2* at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Mohammed H. Alam
    Dominique Auger
    Gillian C. Smith
    Taigang He
    Vassilis Vassiliou
    A. John Baksi
    Rick Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Yanqiu Feng
    David N. Firmin
    Dudley J. Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17