Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot

被引:9
|
作者
Bolen, Geraldine [1 ]
Audigie, Fabrice [2 ]
Spriet, Mathieu [3 ]
Vandenberghe, Filip [4 ]
Busoni, Valeria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Dept Compan Anim & Equidae, Med Imaging Sect, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Natl Vet Sch Alfort, Goustranville, France
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Referral Hosp Horses & Small Anim, Dierenklin Bosdreef, Moerbeke Wass, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Horses; Foot; Magnetic field; Low-field; High-field; DISTAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDON; LOW-FIELD MRI; COLLATERAL LIGAMENTS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; PODOTROCHLEAR APPARATUS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; HORSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jevs.2009.11.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in the investigation of foot pain in horses. The aim of this study was to qualitatively compare ex-vivo MR images of the same equine feet obtained at three magnetic field strengths: 0.27, 1.5, and 3 tesla (T). Ten cadaver feet were used. All feet were imaged with two high-field systems (3T, 1.5T) and with a low-field (LF) system at 0.27 T designed for standing horses. Images were acquired using similar pulse sequences in all 3 MR units. MR images were subjectively evaluated by three independent experienced image analysts for image quality and clarity of visualization of individual anatomical structures using a four-point grading scale. The images from all of the examinations were considered to be of diagnostic value except for the hoof capsule where substantial artifacts were present in LF images with distortion and loss of signal at the dorsal/distal aspect of the hoof capsule in LF images. Anatomical structure scoring values of images obtained at 3T and 1.5T were significantly greater than scores of images obtained at 0.27T. Scores for images obtained at 3T were significantly higher than those for images obtained at 1.5T. Mean score differences between 1.5T and 3T were higher for cartilage of the distal interphalangeal joint and for the ungular cartilages.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 20
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARING BETWEEN MR SPECTROSCOPY DONE AT 1.5T AND 3T
    Tang, Phua Hwee
    Nisa, Sameema
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 77 - 77
  • [22] Brain magnetic resonance imaging lesion volume correlates with physical disability and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: comparison of 1.5T and 3T
    Glanz, Bonnie I.
    Stankiewicz, James M.
    Healy, Brain
    Benedict, Ralph
    Arora, Ashish
    Neema, Mohit
    Guss, Zachary D.
    Buckle, Guy J.
    Houtchens, Maria
    Khoury, Samia
    Weiner, Howard L.
    Guttmann, Charles R.
    Bakshi, Rohit
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2008, 14 : S257 - S257
  • [23] Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of 1.5T and 3T Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease
    Min, Jee Young
    Ko, Sung Min
    Song, In Young
    Yi, Jung Geun
    Hwang, Hweung Kon
    Shin, Je Kyoun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 19 (06) : 1007 - 1020
  • [24] R2*imaging of transfusional iron burden at 3T and comparison with 1.5T
    Storey, Pippa
    Thompson, Alexis A.
    Carqueville, Christine L.
    Wood, John C.
    de Freitas, R. Andrew
    Rigsby, Cynthia K.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (03) : 540 - 547
  • [25] Signal intensity of motor and sensory cortices on T2-weighted and FLAIR images: intraindividual comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI
    Koji Kamada
    Shingo Kakeda
    Norihiro Ohnari
    Junji Moriya
    Toru Sato
    Yukunori Korogi
    European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 2949 - 2955
  • [26] Signal intensity of motor and sensory cortices on T2-weighted and FLAIR images: intraindividual comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI
    Kamada, Koji
    Kakeda, Shingo
    Ohnari, Norihiro
    Moriya, Junji
    Sato, Toru
    Korogi, Yukunori
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) : 2949 - 2955
  • [27] Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
    A. Chopra
    A. J. Grainger
    B. Dube
    R. Evans
    R. Hodgson
    J. Conroy
    D. Macdonald
    Philip Robinson
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 963 - 971
  • [28] Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
    Chopra, A.
    Grainger, A. J.
    Dube, B.
    Evans, R.
    Hodgson, R.
    Conroy, J.
    Macdonald, D.
    Robinson, Philip
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 963 - 971
  • [29] Myocardial T1 responds to adenosine - normal values of stress T1 reactivity at 1.5T and 3T
    Alexander Liu
    Rohan S Wijesurendra
    Jane M Francis
    Matthew D Robson
    Stefan Neubauer
    Stefan K Piechnik
    Vanessa M Ferreira
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [30] Target definition for malignant gliomas: No difference in radiation treatment volumes between 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging
    Guarnaschelli, Jess N.
    Vagal, Achala S.
    McKenzie, Joshua T.
    McPherson, Christopher M.
    Warnick, Ronald E.
    Batra, Vivek
    Breneman, John C.
    Lamba, Michael A.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 4 (05) : E195 - E201