Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot

被引:9
|
作者
Bolen, Geraldine [1 ]
Audigie, Fabrice [2 ]
Spriet, Mathieu [3 ]
Vandenberghe, Filip [4 ]
Busoni, Valeria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Dept Compan Anim & Equidae, Med Imaging Sect, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Natl Vet Sch Alfort, Goustranville, France
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Referral Hosp Horses & Small Anim, Dierenklin Bosdreef, Moerbeke Wass, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Horses; Foot; Magnetic field; Low-field; High-field; DISTAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDON; LOW-FIELD MRI; COLLATERAL LIGAMENTS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; PODOTROCHLEAR APPARATUS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; HORSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jevs.2009.11.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in the investigation of foot pain in horses. The aim of this study was to qualitatively compare ex-vivo MR images of the same equine feet obtained at three magnetic field strengths: 0.27, 1.5, and 3 tesla (T). Ten cadaver feet were used. All feet were imaged with two high-field systems (3T, 1.5T) and with a low-field (LF) system at 0.27 T designed for standing horses. Images were acquired using similar pulse sequences in all 3 MR units. MR images were subjectively evaluated by three independent experienced image analysts for image quality and clarity of visualization of individual anatomical structures using a four-point grading scale. The images from all of the examinations were considered to be of diagnostic value except for the hoof capsule where substantial artifacts were present in LF images with distortion and loss of signal at the dorsal/distal aspect of the hoof capsule in LF images. Anatomical structure scoring values of images obtained at 3T and 1.5T were significantly greater than scores of images obtained at 0.27T. Scores for images obtained at 3T were significantly higher than those for images obtained at 1.5T. Mean score differences between 1.5T and 3T were higher for cartilage of the distal interphalangeal joint and for the ungular cartilages.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 20
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MR proton spectroscopy for myocardial lipid deposition quantification: A quantitative comparison between 1.5T and 3T
    Venkatesh, Bharath Ambale
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Lai, Shenghan
    Steenbergen, Charles
    Liu, Chia-Ying
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (05) : 1222 - 1230
  • [42] Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging methodology and normal values at 1.5 and 3T
    Stirrat, Colin G.
    Alam, Shirjel R.
    MacGillivray, Thomas J.
    Gray, Calum D.
    Forsythe, Rachael
    Dweck, Marc R.
    Payne, John R.
    Prasad, Sanjay K.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    Gardner, Roy S.
    Mirsadraee, Saeed
    Henriksen, Peter A.
    Newby, David E.
    Semple, Scott I. K.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2016, 18
  • [43] Susceptibility Effects in Hyperpolarized 3He Lung MRI at 1.5T and 3T
    Deppe, Martin H.
    Parra-Robles, Juan
    Ajraoui, Salma
    Parnell, Steven R.
    Clemence, Matthew
    Schulte, Rolf F.
    Wild, Jim M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (02) : 418 - 423
  • [44] Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging methodology and normal values at 1.5 and 3T
    Colin G. Stirrat
    Shirjel R. Alam
    Thomas J. MacGillivray
    Calum D. Gray
    Rachael Forsythe
    Marc R. Dweck
    John R. Payne
    Sanjay K. Prasad
    Mark C. Petrie
    Roy S. Gardner
    Saeed Mirsadraee
    Peter A. Henriksen
    David E. Newby
    Scott I. K. Semple
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18
  • [45] Balanced left ventricular myocardial SSFP-tagging at 1.5T and 3T
    Markl, M.
    Scherer, S.
    Frydrychowicz, A.
    Burger, D.
    Geibel, A.
    Hennig, J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (03) : 631 - 639
  • [46] BOLD and perfusion fMRI of generalised spike wave activity at 1.5T and 3T
    Hamandi, Khalid
    Laufs, Helmut
    Carmichael, David
    Noeth, Ulrike
    Paul, Joseph Suresh
    Duncan, John
    Lemieux, Louis
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 70 - 70
  • [47] Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL
    Rakow-Penner, R
    Daniel, B
    Yu, HZ
    Sawyer-Glover, A
    Glover, GH
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [48] Strengths and Weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS Data in Brain Glioma Classification
    Kounelakis, M. G.
    Dimou, I. N.
    Zervakis, M. E.
    Tsougos, I.
    Tsolaki, E.
    Kousi, E.
    Kapsalaki, E.
    Theodorou, K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 15 (04): : 647 - 654
  • [49] What you Need to Know About MR Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Tanenbaum, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [50] Applications of dielectric pads, novel materials and resonators in 1.5T and 3T MRI
    Slobozhanyuk, A.
    Zivkovic, I.
    Shchelokova, A.
    Mikhailovskaya, A.
    Sushkov, I.
    Nenasheva, E.
    Melchakova, I.
    Belov, P.
    Webb, A.
    METANANO 2019, 2020, 1461