Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot

被引:24
|
作者
Sormaala, Markus J. [1 ,3 ]
Ruohola, Juha-Petri [1 ]
Mattila, Ville M. [1 ,2 ]
Koskinen, Seppo K. [3 ]
Pihlajamaki, Harri K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Mil Med, Res Dept, FIN-00301 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Trauma, Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
RESOLUTION MRI; FRACTURES; INJURIES; ANKLE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-12-128
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Bone stress injuries are common in athletes and military recruits. Only a minority of bone stress changes are available on plain radiographs. Acute bone stress is often visible on MRI as bone marrow edema, which is also seen in many other disease processes such as malignancies, inflammatory conditions and infections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of radiographs, 1.5T and 3T MRI to identify acute bone marrow changes in the foot. Methods: Ten patients with 12 stress fractures seen on plain radiographs underwent MRI using 1.5T and 3T scanners. T1 FSE and STIR axial, sagittal, and coronal view sequences were obtained. Two musculoskeletal radiologists interpreted the images independently and by consensus in case of disagreement. Results: Of the 63 acute bone stress changes seen on 3T images, 61 were also seen on 1.5T images. The sensitivity of 1.5T MRI was 97% (95% CI: 89%-99%) compared with 3T. The 3T MRI images where, therefore, at least equally sensitive to 1.5T scanners in detection of bone marrow edema. On T1-weighted sequences, 3T images were slightly superior to 1.5T images in visualizing the demarcation of the edema and bone trabeculae. The kappa-value for inter-observer variability was 0.86 in the MRI indicating substantial interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Owing to slightly better resolution of 3T images, edema characterization is easier, which might aid in the differential diagnosis of the bone marrow edema. There was, however, no noteworthy difference in the sensitivity of the 1.5T and 3T images to bone marrow edema. Routine identification of acute bone stress changes and suspected stress injuries can, therefore, be made with 1.5T field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Signal intensity of motor and sensory cortices on T2-weighted and FLAIR images: intraindividual comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI
    Kamada, Koji
    Kakeda, Shingo
    Ohnari, Norihiro
    Moriya, Junji
    Sato, Toru
    Korogi, Yukunori
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) : 2949 - 2955
  • [42] PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARING THE IMAGE QUALITY OF ENDORECTAL MRI AT 1.5T WITH 3T MRI WITHOUT THE ENDORECTAL COIL
    Jia, Guang
    Shah, Zarine
    Wei, Lai
    Knopp, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E895 - E896
  • [43] MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: Evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images
    Kataoka, Masako
    Kido, Aki
    Koyama, Takashi
    Isoda, Hiroyoshi
    Umeoka, Shigeaki
    Tamai, Ken
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Maetani, Yoji
    Morisawa, Nobuko
    Saga, Tsuneo
    Togashi, Kaori
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (03) : 527 - 534
  • [44] Occult Amyloid-β-Related Angiitis: Neuroimaging Findings at 1.5T, 3T, and 7T MRI
    Ozutemiz, Can
    Hussein, Haitham M.
    Ikramuddin, Salman
    Clark, H. Brent
    Charidimou, Andreas
    Streib, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 45 (08) : 1013 - 1018
  • [45] T2*EVALUATION OF IRON OVERLOAD AT 3T AND COMPARISON WITH 1.5 T
    Pepe, A.
    Meloni, A.
    De Marchi, D.
    Positano, V.
    Menichetti, L.
    Keilberg, P.
    Dell'Amico, M. C.
    Rizzello, M. C.
    Valeri, G.
    Lombardi, M.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 95 : 419 - 419
  • [46] FUNCTIONAL MRI AT 1.5T
    SINGH, M
    KIM, H
    KIM, T
    KHOSLA, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1994, 41 (04) : 1649 - 1655
  • [47] Comparison of 1.5T and 3T 1H MR spectroscopy for human brain tumors
    Kim, Ji-hoon
    Chang, Kee-Hyun
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Song, In Chan
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Kwon, Bae Ju
    Han, Moon Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) : 156 - 161
  • [48] Improved BOLD Signal Detectability of Short Breath Holding Duration at 3T: A Comparison with 1.5T
    Kuan, W.
    Hsu, Y.
    Lim, K.
    Liu, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [49] MRI-based measurements of whole-brain global cerebral blood flow: Comparison and validation at 1.5T and 3T
    Chen, Chun-Ming
    Huang, Yen-Chih
    Shih, Cheng-Ting
    Chen, Yung-Fang
    Peng, Shin-Lei
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (05) : 1273 - 1280
  • [50] Targeting accuracy for electrode placement and 1.5T vs 3T comparison in MRI-based stereotactic neurosurgery: A phantom study
    Perez, J.
    Gonzalez, V.
    Cif, L.
    James, S.
    Roujeau, T.
    Sanrey, E.
    Capdevielle, D.
    Tichet, A. L.
    LeBars, E.
    Bonafe, A.
    Zanca, M.
    Coubes, P.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2014, 29 : S25 - S26