Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

被引:15
|
作者
Schubert, Tilman [1 ,7 ]
Takes, Martin [1 ]
Aschwanden, Markus [2 ]
Klarhoefer, Markus [3 ]
Haas, Tanja [1 ]
Jacob, Augustinus L. [4 ]
Liu, David [5 ]
Gutzeit, Andreas [6 ]
Kos, Sebastian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Angiol, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Div Radiol Phys, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Radiol Clin Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Hirslanden Clin St Anna, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, 600 Highland Ave,E1-374, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance angiography; Non-contrast; High resolution; Small vessel; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; SINGLE-SHOT MRA; RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LOWER-EXTREMITIES; LIMB SALVAGE; T; EXPERIENCE; GADOLINIUM; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-4068-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was conducted in order to compare a high resolution, non-contrast-enhanced MRA (NATIVE SPACE, NE-MRA) of the pedal vasculature with contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). The prospective study consists of 20 PAOD patients. All patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting and received MR angiographies the following day. With CE-MRA, 75.7 % of vessel segments showed good, 16.4 % suboptimal and 7.9 % not usable image quality. With NE-MRA, 64.6 % showed good, 18.6 % suboptimal and 16.8 % not usable image quality. CE-MRA showed a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 90 %/95 % regarding significant stenosis (greater than 50 %), and specificity and positive predictive value were 88 %/77 %. Accordingly, sensitivity and negative predictive value for the NE-MRA were 96 %/97 % and specificity and positive predictive value were 80 %/69 % for stenoses greater than 50 %. The applied NE-MRA technique achieves high diagnostic accuracy even in very small distal arteries of the foot. However, the rate of non-diagnostic vessel segments is considerably higher for NE-MRA than for CE-MRA. NE-MRA is a valuable alternative to CE-MRA in selected patients. Comparison of non-enhanced MRA with contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA as gold standard. High resolution MRA at 3 T for the depiction of small pedal vessels. Evaluation of high resolution non-enhanced MRA in PAOD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2713
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Peripheral arterial disease: Comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis
    Leiner, T
    Kessels, AGH
    Nelemans, PJ
    Vasbinder, GBC
    de Haan, MW
    Kitslaar, PEJHM
    Ho, KYJAM
    Tordoir, JHM
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 699 - 708
  • [32] High-Resolution 3D Unenhanced ECG-Gated Respiratory-Navigated MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
    Mohrs, Oliver K.
    Petersen, Steffen E.
    Schulze, Thomas
    Zieschang, Michael
    Kuex, Harald
    Schmitt, Peter
    Bergemann, Sabine
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (06) : 1423 - 1428
  • [33] Quantitative analysis of ECG-gated high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta
    Groves, Elliott M.
    Bireley, William
    Dill, Karin
    Carroll, Timothy J.
    Carr, James C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (02) : 522 - 528
  • [34] Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography
    Saloner, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 1034 - 1035
  • [35] High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography
    Fain, SB
    King, BF
    Breen, JF
    Kruger, DG
    Riederer, SJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) : 481 - 490
  • [36] Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography
    Borisch, I
    Horn, M
    Butz, B
    Zorger, N
    Draganski, B
    Hoelscher, T
    Bogdahn, U
    Link, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 1117 - 1122
  • [37] Evaluation and comparison of ECG-gated techniques at 1.5 T for contrast enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta
    Tendoh Timoh
    Ruth P Lim
    Mary Bruno
    Gary R McNeal
    Yutaka Natsuaki
    Monvadi B Srichai
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [38] Magnetization spoiling in radial FLASH contrast-enhanced MR digital subtraction angiography
    Vakil, Parmede
    Ansari, Sameer A.
    Hurley, Michael C.
    Bhat, Himanshu
    Batjer, H. Hunt
    Bendok, Bernard R.
    Eddleman, Christopher S.
    Carroll, Timothy J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (01) : 249 - 258
  • [39] Measuring Carotid Stenosis With a Novel Non-contrast Enhanced MR Angiography Technique (SNAP): Comparison With Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
    Shu, Hongge
    Sun Jie
    Balu, Niranjan
    Liu Haining
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Hatsukami, Thomas S.
    Yuan Chun
    STROKE, 2016, 47
  • [40] Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T
    Guo, Xiaoxia
    Gong, Ying
    Wu, Zhiyuan
    Yan, Fuhua
    Ding, Xiaoyi
    Xu, Xueqin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1747 - 1754