Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

被引:15
|
作者
Schubert, Tilman [1 ,7 ]
Takes, Martin [1 ]
Aschwanden, Markus [2 ]
Klarhoefer, Markus [3 ]
Haas, Tanja [1 ]
Jacob, Augustinus L. [4 ]
Liu, David [5 ]
Gutzeit, Andreas [6 ]
Kos, Sebastian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Angiol, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Div Radiol Phys, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Radiol Clin Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Hirslanden Clin St Anna, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, 600 Highland Ave,E1-374, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance angiography; Non-contrast; High resolution; Small vessel; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; SINGLE-SHOT MRA; RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LOWER-EXTREMITIES; LIMB SALVAGE; T; EXPERIENCE; GADOLINIUM; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-4068-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was conducted in order to compare a high resolution, non-contrast-enhanced MRA (NATIVE SPACE, NE-MRA) of the pedal vasculature with contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). The prospective study consists of 20 PAOD patients. All patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting and received MR angiographies the following day. With CE-MRA, 75.7 % of vessel segments showed good, 16.4 % suboptimal and 7.9 % not usable image quality. With NE-MRA, 64.6 % showed good, 18.6 % suboptimal and 16.8 % not usable image quality. CE-MRA showed a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 90 %/95 % regarding significant stenosis (greater than 50 %), and specificity and positive predictive value were 88 %/77 %. Accordingly, sensitivity and negative predictive value for the NE-MRA were 96 %/97 % and specificity and positive predictive value were 80 %/69 % for stenoses greater than 50 %. The applied NE-MRA technique achieves high diagnostic accuracy even in very small distal arteries of the foot. However, the rate of non-diagnostic vessel segments is considerably higher for NE-MRA than for CE-MRA. NE-MRA is a valuable alternative to CE-MRA in selected patients. Comparison of non-enhanced MRA with contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA as gold standard. High resolution MRA at 3 T for the depiction of small pedal vessels. Evaluation of high resolution non-enhanced MRA in PAOD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2713
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the hand
    Connell, DA
    Koulouris, G
    Thorn, DA
    Potter, HG
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (03) : 583 - 599
  • [42] Selective contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Bos, C
    Smits, HFM
    Bakker, CJG
    Viergever, MA
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2000, 44 (04) : 575 - 582
  • [43] Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T
    Xiaoxia Guo
    Ying Gong
    Zhiyuan Wu
    Fuhua Yan
    Xiaoyi Ding
    Xueqin Xu
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 1747 - 1754
  • [44] 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients
    Michael Rasper
    Moritz Wildgruber
    Marcus Settles
    Hans-Henning Eckstein
    Alexander Zimmermann
    Christian Reeps
    Ernst J. Rummeny
    Armin M. Huber
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 2871 - 2880
  • [45] Vertebrobasilar stenoses: Comparison of non-contrast MR angiography and ultrafast contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intravenous contrast agent
    Sommer, A
    Neff, KW
    Gaa, JA
    Gass, A
    Daffertshofer, M
    Schwartz, A
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1137 - 1137
  • [46] 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients
    Rasper, Michael
    Wildgruber, Moritz
    Settles, Marcus
    Eckstein, Hans-Henning
    Zimmermann, Alexander
    Reeps, Christian
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Huber, Armin M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (09) : 2871 - 2880
  • [47] Non-Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3 Tesla in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
    Thierfelder, Kolja M.
    Meimarakis, Georgios
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Schmitt, Peter
    Kazmierczak, Philipp M.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Theisen, Daniel
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [48] Is contrast-enhanced MR angiography an alternative to selective DSA in supraaortic occlusive disease
    Link, J
    Steffens, JC
    Wesner, FO
    Graessner, J
    Heller, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 318 - 319
  • [49] Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients
    Winterer, JT
    Laubenberger, J
    Scheffler, K
    Neumann, K
    Bayraktarli, YR
    Allmann, KH
    Uhrmeister, P
    Langer, M
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (04) : 583 - 589
  • [50] Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease
    Ouwendijk, R
    Kock, MCJM
    Visser, K
    Pattynama, PMT
    de Haan, MW
    Hunink, MGM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (05) : 1261 - 1267