Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

被引:15
|
作者
Schubert, Tilman [1 ,7 ]
Takes, Martin [1 ]
Aschwanden, Markus [2 ]
Klarhoefer, Markus [3 ]
Haas, Tanja [1 ]
Jacob, Augustinus L. [4 ]
Liu, David [5 ]
Gutzeit, Andreas [6 ]
Kos, Sebastian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Angiol, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Radiol & Nucl Med, Div Radiol Phys, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Radiol Clin Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Hirslanden Clin St Anna, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, 600 Highland Ave,E1-374, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance angiography; Non-contrast; High resolution; Small vessel; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; SINGLE-SHOT MRA; RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LOWER-EXTREMITIES; LIMB SALVAGE; T; EXPERIENCE; GADOLINIUM; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-4068-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was conducted in order to compare a high resolution, non-contrast-enhanced MRA (NATIVE SPACE, NE-MRA) of the pedal vasculature with contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). The prospective study consists of 20 PAOD patients. All patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting and received MR angiographies the following day. With CE-MRA, 75.7 % of vessel segments showed good, 16.4 % suboptimal and 7.9 % not usable image quality. With NE-MRA, 64.6 % showed good, 18.6 % suboptimal and 16.8 % not usable image quality. CE-MRA showed a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 90 %/95 % regarding significant stenosis (greater than 50 %), and specificity and positive predictive value were 88 %/77 %. Accordingly, sensitivity and negative predictive value for the NE-MRA were 96 %/97 % and specificity and positive predictive value were 80 %/69 % for stenoses greater than 50 %. The applied NE-MRA technique achieves high diagnostic accuracy even in very small distal arteries of the foot. However, the rate of non-diagnostic vessel segments is considerably higher for NE-MRA than for CE-MRA. NE-MRA is a valuable alternative to CE-MRA in selected patients. Comparison of non-enhanced MRA with contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA as gold standard. High resolution MRA at 3 T for the depiction of small pedal vessels. Evaluation of high resolution non-enhanced MRA in PAOD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2713
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels
    R. Vosshenrich
    L. Kopka
    E. Grabbe
    Der Radiologe, 1997, 37 : 579 - 586
  • [22] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Bosmans, H
    Marchal, G
    RADIOLOGE, 1996, 36 (02): : 115 - 123
  • [23] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    J. H. Maki
    T. L. Chenevert
    M. R. Prince
    Abdominal Imaging, 1998, 23 : 469 - 484
  • [24] CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR ANGIOGRAPHY
    RUNGE, VM
    KIRSCH, JE
    LEE, C
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 233 - 239
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Maki, JH
    Chenevert, TL
    Prince, MR
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1998, 23 (05): : 469 - 484
  • [26] Techniques of dynamic subtraction contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Leiner, T
    Ho, KYJAM
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (04) : 1113 - 1113
  • [27] Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery:: Comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography
    Remonda, L
    Senn, P
    Barth, A
    Arnold, M
    Lövblad, KO
    Schroth, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (02) : 213 - 219
  • [28] Hemodialysis access imaging: Comparison of flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography
    Smits, JHM
    Bos, C
    Elgersma, OEH
    van der Mark, WAMA
    Blankestijn, PJ
    Bakker, CJG
    Zijlstra, JJ
    Kalmijn, S
    Mali, WPTM
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 829 - 834
  • [29] Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography
    Kreft, B
    Strunk, H
    Flacke, S
    Wolff, M
    Conrad, R
    Gieseke, J
    Pauleit, D
    Bachmann, R
    Hirner, A
    Schild, HH
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [30] A comparison of time-of-flight mr angiography, contrast-enhanced mr angiography and ct angiography to evaluate vessel area in a rabbit peripheral arterial disease model
    Yi Xu
    Y Fu
    D Kedziorek
    N Azene
    T Ehtiati
    A Flamang
    SM Shea
    DL Kraitchman
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13 (Suppl 1)