Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D

被引:19
|
作者
Tatsugami, Fuminari [1 ]
Higaki, Toru [1 ]
Fukumoto, Wataru [1 ]
Kaichi, Yoko [1 ]
Fujioka, Chikako [2 ]
Kiguchi, Masao [2 ]
Yamamoto, Hideya [3 ]
Kihara, Yasuki [3 ]
Awai, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
来源
关键词
Coronary artery calcium; Iterative reconstruction; Dose reduction; 320-detector CT scanner; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TRIGGERED 64-SLICE CT; INTERSCAN VARIABILITY; HEART-ASSOCIATION; CARDIAC CT; QUANTIFICATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-015-0637-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the possibility of reducing the radiation dose for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on a 320-detector CT scanner. Fifty-four patients underwent routine- and low-dose CT for CAC scoring. Low-dose CT was performed at one-third of the tube current used for routine-dose CT. Routine-dose CT was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and low-dose CT was reconstructed with AIDR 3D. We compared the calculated Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores of these images. The overall percentage difference in the Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores between routine- and low-dose CT studies was 15.9, 11.6, and 12.6 %, respectively. There were no significant differences in the routine- and low-dose CT studies irrespective of the scoring algorithms applied. The CAC measurements of both imaging modalities were highly correlated with respect to the Agatston- (r = 0.996), volume- (r = 0.996), and mass score (r = 0.997; p < 0.001, all); the Bland-Altman limits of agreement scores were -37.4 to 51.4, -31.2 to 36.4 and -30.3 to 40.9 %, respectively, suggesting that AIDR 3D was a good alternative for FBP. The mean effective radiation dose for routine- and low-dose CT was 2.2 and 0.7 mSv, respectively. The use of AIDR 3D made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 67 % for CAC scoring without impairing the quantification of coronary calcification.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1052
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effective Dose Reduction for Non-contrast CT Thorax Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) 3D and Ultra-low Milliampere Second Techniques
    Angelov, D.
    Salati, U.
    Kok, T.
    Buckley, O.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : 263 - 264
  • [42] 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose
    Qin, J.
    Liu, L-Y
    Fang, Y.
    Zhu, J-M
    Wu, Z.
    Zhu, K-S
    Zhang, J-S
    Shan, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1015): : 945 - 951
  • [43] Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose
    Qin, Jie
    Liu, Ling-yun
    Meng, Xiao-chun
    Zhang, Jian-sheng
    Dong, Yun-xu
    Fang, Yuan
    Shan, Hong
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2011, 35 (03) : 193 - 197
  • [44] Reduction of the radiation dose and the amount of contrast material in hepatic dynamic CT using low tube voltage and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Yamamoto, Kiyohito
    Sakane, Makoto
    Nakai, Go
    Higashiyama, Akira
    Juri, Hiroshi
    Yoshikawa, Shushi
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (34)
  • [45] Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Coronary Angiography with Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Strong Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional (AIDR3D)
    Shen, Hesong
    Dai, Guochao
    Luo, Mingyue
    Duan, Chaijie
    Cai, Wenli
    Liang, Dan
    Wang, Xinhua
    Zhu, Dongyun
    Li, Wenru
    Qiu, Jianping
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [46] Forward-Projected Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Screening Low-Dose Chest CT: Comparison With Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D
    Hassani, Cameron
    Ronco, Anthony
    Prosper, Ashley E.
    Dissanayake, Sumudu
    Cen, Steven Y.
    Lee, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (03) : 548 - 556
  • [47] Half-dose Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Impact of Iterative Reconstruction
    Caruso, Damiano
    De Santis, Domenico
    Biondi, Tommaso
    Panvini, Nicola
    Zerunian, Marta
    Rivosecchi, Flaminia
    Montesano, Marta
    Bellini, Davide
    Rengo, Marco
    Laghi, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2019, 34 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [48] Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: Comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D
    Gervaise, A.
    Osemont, B.
    Louis, M.
    Lecocq, S.
    Teixeira, P.
    Blum, A.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [49] CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction
    Ebersberger, Ullrich
    Tricarico, Francesco
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Blanke, Philipp
    Spears, J. Reid
    Rowe, Garrett W.
    Halligan, William T.
    Henzler, Thomas
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Leber, Alexander W.
    Hoffmann, Ellen
    Apfaltrer, Paul
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 125 - 132
  • [50] CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction
    Ullrich Ebersberger
    Francesco Tricarico
    U. Joseph Schoepf
    Philipp Blanke
    J. Reid Spears
    Garrett W. Rowe
    William T. Halligan
    Thomas Henzler
    Fabian Bamberg
    Alexander W. Leber
    Ellen Hoffmann
    Paul Apfaltrer
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 125 - 132