Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D

被引:19
|
作者
Tatsugami, Fuminari [1 ]
Higaki, Toru [1 ]
Fukumoto, Wataru [1 ]
Kaichi, Yoko [1 ]
Fujioka, Chikako [2 ]
Kiguchi, Masao [2 ]
Yamamoto, Hideya [3 ]
Kihara, Yasuki [3 ]
Awai, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
来源
关键词
Coronary artery calcium; Iterative reconstruction; Dose reduction; 320-detector CT scanner; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TRIGGERED 64-SLICE CT; INTERSCAN VARIABILITY; HEART-ASSOCIATION; CARDIAC CT; QUANTIFICATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-015-0637-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the possibility of reducing the radiation dose for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on a 320-detector CT scanner. Fifty-four patients underwent routine- and low-dose CT for CAC scoring. Low-dose CT was performed at one-third of the tube current used for routine-dose CT. Routine-dose CT was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and low-dose CT was reconstructed with AIDR 3D. We compared the calculated Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores of these images. The overall percentage difference in the Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores between routine- and low-dose CT studies was 15.9, 11.6, and 12.6 %, respectively. There were no significant differences in the routine- and low-dose CT studies irrespective of the scoring algorithms applied. The CAC measurements of both imaging modalities were highly correlated with respect to the Agatston- (r = 0.996), volume- (r = 0.996), and mass score (r = 0.997; p < 0.001, all); the Bland-Altman limits of agreement scores were -37.4 to 51.4, -31.2 to 36.4 and -30.3 to 40.9 %, respectively, suggesting that AIDR 3D was a good alternative for FBP. The mean effective radiation dose for routine- and low-dose CT was 2.2 and 0.7 mSv, respectively. The use of AIDR 3D made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 67 % for CAC scoring without impairing the quantification of coronary calcification.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1052
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiation Dose of Second-Generation 320-Detector Row CT Response
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Shanbhag, Sujata M.
    Arai, Andrew E.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) : 928 - 928
  • [22] Adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D in low dose CT abdomen-pelvis: Effects on image quality and radiation exposure
    Ang, W. C.
    Hashim, S.
    Karim, M. K. A.
    Bahruddin, N. A.
    Salehhon, N.
    Musa, Y.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON MEDICAL PHYSICS & 1ST AMDI INTERNATIONAL ONCOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, 2017, 851
  • [23] Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study
    Seki, Shinichiro
    Koyama, Hisanobu
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    Matsumoto, Sumiaki
    Inokawa, Hiroyasu
    Sugihara, Naoki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (06) : 684 - 690
  • [24] Reduced radiation dose with model based iterative reconstruction coronary artery calcium scoring
    Chor, Andrew D.
    Leifer, Eric S.
    Yu, Jeannie H.
    Datta, Tanuka
    Bronson, Kathie C.
    Rollison, Shirley F.
    Schuzer, John L.
    Steveson, Chloe
    Shanbhag, Sujata M.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 111 : 1 - 5
  • [25] A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography
    Yu, S.
    Zhang, L.
    Zheng, J.
    Xu, Y.
    Chen, Y.
    Song, Z.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) : 96.e1 - 96.e6
  • [26] Emphysema Quantification by Low-Dose CT: Potential Impact of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Using 3D Processing
    Nishio, Mizuho
    Matsumoto, Sumiaki
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    Sugihara, Naoki
    Inokawa, Hiroyasu
    Yoshikawa, Takeshi
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (03) : 595 - 601
  • [27] Radiation dose reduction in CT coronary angiography
    Shapiro B.P.
    Young P.M.
    Kantor B.
    Choe Y.H.
    McCollough C.H.
    Gerber T.C.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2010, 12 (1) : 59 - 67
  • [28] Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT
    Choi, Andrew D.
    Leifer, Eric S.
    Yu, Jeannie
    Shanbhag, Sujata M.
    Bronson, Kathie
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 10 (05) : 359 - 363
  • [29] High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction
    Georg Apfaltrer
    Moritz H. Albrecht
    U. Joseph Schoepf
    Taylor M. Duguay
    Carlo N. De Cecco
    John W. Nance
    Domenico De Santis
    Paul Apfaltrer
    Marwen H. Eid
    Chelsea D. Eason
    Zachary M. Thompson
    Maximilian J. Bauer
    Akos Varga-Szemes
    Brian E. Jacobs
    Erich Sorantin
    Christian Tesche
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 3097 - 3104
  • [30] High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction
    Apfaltrer, Georg
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Duguay, Taylor M.
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Nance, John W.
    De Santis, Domenico
    Apfaltrer, Paul
    Eid, Marwen H.
    Eason, Chelsea D.
    Thompson, Zachary M.
    Bauer, Maximilian J.
    Varga-Szemes, Akos
    Jacobs, Brian E.
    Sorantin, Erich
    Tesche, Christian
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (07) : 3097 - 3104