Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D

被引:19
|
作者
Tatsugami, Fuminari [1 ]
Higaki, Toru [1 ]
Fukumoto, Wataru [1 ]
Kaichi, Yoko [1 ]
Fujioka, Chikako [2 ]
Kiguchi, Masao [2 ]
Yamamoto, Hideya [3 ]
Kihara, Yasuki [3 ]
Awai, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Radiol, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
来源
关键词
Coronary artery calcium; Iterative reconstruction; Dose reduction; 320-detector CT scanner; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TRIGGERED 64-SLICE CT; INTERSCAN VARIABILITY; HEART-ASSOCIATION; CARDIAC CT; QUANTIFICATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-015-0637-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the possibility of reducing the radiation dose for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on a 320-detector CT scanner. Fifty-four patients underwent routine- and low-dose CT for CAC scoring. Low-dose CT was performed at one-third of the tube current used for routine-dose CT. Routine-dose CT was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and low-dose CT was reconstructed with AIDR 3D. We compared the calculated Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores of these images. The overall percentage difference in the Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores between routine- and low-dose CT studies was 15.9, 11.6, and 12.6 %, respectively. There were no significant differences in the routine- and low-dose CT studies irrespective of the scoring algorithms applied. The CAC measurements of both imaging modalities were highly correlated with respect to the Agatston- (r = 0.996), volume- (r = 0.996), and mass score (r = 0.997; p < 0.001, all); the Bland-Altman limits of agreement scores were -37.4 to 51.4, -31.2 to 36.4 and -30.3 to 40.9 %, respectively, suggesting that AIDR 3D was a good alternative for FBP. The mean effective radiation dose for routine- and low-dose CT was 2.2 and 0.7 mSv, respectively. The use of AIDR 3D made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 67 % for CAC scoring without impairing the quantification of coronary calcification.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1052
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Versus Filtered Back Projection in CT: Evaluation of Image Quality
    Joemai, Raoul M. S.
    Veldkamp, Wouter J. H.
    Kroft, Lucia J. M.
    Hernandez-Giron, Irene
    Geleijns, Jacob
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (06) : 1291 - 1297
  • [32] Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Using 3D Processing for Reduced-and Low-Dose Pulmonary CT: Comparison With Standard-Dose CT for Image Noise Reduction and Radiological Findings
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    Takenaka, Daisuke
    Kanda, Tomonori
    Yoshikawa, Takeshi
    Matsumoto, Sumiaki
    Sugihara, Naoki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (04) : W477 - W485
  • [33] Radiation Dose from Single-Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a 320-Detector Row Volume Scanner
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    Elliston, Carl D.
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Mather, Richard
    Pearson, Gregory D. N.
    DeLaPaz, Robert L.
    Nickoloff, Edward
    Dutta, Ajoy
    Brenner, David J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) : 698 - 706
  • [34] Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients
    Tang, Ya-Chun
    Liu, Yuan-Chang
    Hsu, Ming-Yi
    Tsai, Hui-Yu
    Chen, Chien-Ming
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (08) : 1010 - 1017
  • [35] Estimated Radiation Dose Reduction Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Coronary CT Angiography: The ERASIR Study
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    LaBounty, Troy M.
    Heilbron, Brett
    Min, James K.
    Mancini, G. B. John
    Lin, Fay Y.
    Taylor, Carolyn
    Dunning, Allison
    Earls, James P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (03) : 655 - 660
  • [36] Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection
    Matsuki, Mitsuru
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Juri, Hiroshi
    Yoshikawa, Shushi
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (08) : 869 - 875
  • [37] Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection
    Roh-Eul Yoo
    Eun-Ah Park
    Whal Lee
    Hackjoon Shim
    Yeo Koon Kim
    Jin Wook Chung
    Jae Hyung Park
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013, 29 : 669 - 676
  • [38] Use of 3D Adaptive Raw-Data Filter in CT of the Lung: Effect on Radiation Dose Reduction
    Kubo, Takeshi
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    Gautam, Shiva
    Lin, Pei-Jan P.
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Hatabu, Hiroto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (04) : W167 - W174
  • [39] Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection
    Yoo, Roh-Eul
    Park, Eun-Ah
    Lee, Whal
    Shim, Hackjoon
    Kim, Yeo Koon
    Chung, Jin Wook
    Park, Jae Hyung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 29 (03): : 669 - 676
  • [40] Radiation Dose Reduction with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction for Pediatric CT
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha S.
    Saini, Aashna
    Gervais, Debra A.
    Westra, Sjirk J.
    Thrall, James H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (02) : 537 - 546