Recommendations from Cochrane reviews for improving future trials on anesthesia and pain: a meta-research study

被引:3
|
作者
Runjic, Renata [1 ]
Plenkovic, Mia [2 ]
Pirosca, Stefania [3 ]
Clarke, Mike [4 ]
Treweek, Shaun [5 ]
Puljak, Livia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[2] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med Med Sci Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Northern Ireland Methodol Hub, Belfast, North Ireland
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
anesthesia; Cochrane systematic review; implications for research; pain; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2022-0042
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) have a section 'Implications for research' where authors make suggestions for improving future research. The authors of the present study assessed the prevalence and time dynamics of different recommendations in the CSRs about anesthesia and pain. Methods: The authors included all CSRs published by the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group and Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group before 17 July 2020. The authors analyzed recommendations for improving future research listed in the 'Implications for research' section of these CSRs and categorized recommendations for improvements. Results: They analyzed 370 reviews. Four categories of recommendations were present in more than 40% of the reviews. Most reviews recommended a larger sample size and better outcome choice, study design and choice of future intervention. These recommendations gradually increased in frequency in the Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group and mainly decreased in the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Conclusion: Recommendations from CSRs offer useful advice for trialists designing new trials.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lack of attention to sex and gender in periodontitis-related randomized clinical trials: A meta-research study
    Michelson, Courtney
    Al-Abedalla, Khadijeh
    Wagner, Julie
    Swede, Helen
    Bernstein, Eric
    Ioannidou, Effie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2022, 49 (12) : 1320 - 1333
  • [42] Heterogeneity of outcomes in randomized controlled trials on implant prosthodontic therapy is hindering comparative effectiveness research: meta-research study
    Ante Vardić
    Livia Puljak
    Tea Galić
    Joško Viskić
    Ena Kuliš
    Tina Poklepović Peričić
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [43] A meta-research study revealed several challenges in obtaining placebos for investigator-initiated drug trials
    Speich, Benjamin
    Logullo, Patricia
    Deuster, Stefanie
    Marian, Ioana R.
    Moschandreas, Joanna
    Heravi, Ala Taji
    Gloy, Viktoria
    Briel, Matthias
    Hopewell, Sally
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 131 : 70 - 78
  • [44] Heterogeneity of outcomes in randomized controlled trials on implant prosthodontic therapy is hindering comparative effectiveness research: meta-research study
    Vardic, Ante
    Puljak, Livia
    Galic, Tea
    Viskic, Josko
    Kulis, Ena
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [45] Treatment effects in randomised trials using routinely collected data for outcome assessment versus traditional trials: meta-research study
    Cord, Kimberly A. Mc
    Ewald, Hannah
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Glinz, Dominik
    Aghlmandi, Soheila
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Hemkens, Lars G.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [46] Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Feller, Daniel
    Giagio, Silvia
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Minnucci, Silvia
    Brindisino, Fabrizio
    Cosentino, Carola
    Piano, Leonardo
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Ostelo, Raymond
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 26 (05)
  • [47] Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
    Phi-Yen Nguyen
    Kanukula, Raju
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Alqaidoom, Zainab
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Hamilton, Daniel G.
    Karunananthan, Sathya
    McDonald, Steve
    Moher, David
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    Nunan, David
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Page, Matthew J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 379
  • [48] Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop
    Busse, Jason W.
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    Dougados, Maxime
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Kirwan, John R.
    Kwoh, Kent
    Maxwell, Lara J.
    Moore, Andrew
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Stevens, Randall
    Strand, Vibeke
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    Tugwell, Peter
    Wells, George A.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 42 (10) : 1962 - 1970
  • [49] Completeness of Reporting in Diet- and Nutrition-Related Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analysis: Protocol for 2 Independent Meta-Research Studies
    Silva, Flavia
    Adegboye, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim
    Lachat, Carl
    Curioni, Cintia
    Gomes, Fabio
    Collins, Gary S.
    Kac, Gilberto
    de Beyer, Jennifer Anne
    Cook, Jonathan
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Page, Matthew
    Khandpur, Neha
    Lamb, Sarah
    Hopewell, Sally
    Kirtley, Shona
    Durao, Solange
    Vorland, Colby J.
    Schlussel, Michael M.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [50] The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals
    Rosen, Diane
    Reiter, Nils L.
    Vogel, Barbara
    Prill, Robert
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)