Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study

被引：19
|
作者：
Innocenti, Tiziano [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Feller, Daniel [3 ]
Giagio, Silvia [4 ,5 ]
Salvioli, Stefano [2 ,6 ]
Minnucci, Silvia [7 ]
Brindisino, Fabrizio [7 ,8 ]
Cosentino, Carola [6 ]
Piano, Leonardo [9 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [1 ,10 ]
Ostelo, Raymond [1 ,11 ]
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Fac Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] GIMBE Fdn, Bologna, Italy
[3] Prov Agcy Hlth Autonomous Prov Trento, Trento, Italy
[4] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Bologna, Div Occupat Med, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[6] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[7] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Clin Sci & Translat Med, Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy
[9] Fdn Santi Lorenzo & Teobaldo, Unit Rehabil & Funct Recovery, Rodello, Italy
[10] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[11] Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[12] De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词：
Meta-research; Randomised controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Reporting guidelines; Research quality; Risk of bias; REPORTING QUALITY; METAANALYSES; GUIDELINES; TRIALS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100450
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are essential resources for the clini-cians. They allow to evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of the evidence to support clini-cal decision-making if they are adequately reported. Little is known in the rehabilitation field about the completeness of reporting of SRs and its relationship with the risk of bias (ROB). Objectives: Primary: 1) To evaluate the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews (SRs) published in rehabilitation journals by evaluating their adherence to the PRISMA 2009 checklist, 2) To investigate the relationship between ROB and completeness of reporting. Secondary: To study the association between completeness of reporting and journals and study characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study
    Tam, Wilson W. S.
    Lo, Kenneth K. H.
    Khalechelvam, Parames
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [2] Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study
    Babic, Andrija
    Barcot, Ognjen
    Viskovic, Tomislav
    Saric, Frano
    Kirkovski, Aleksandar
    Barun, Ivana
    Krizanac, Zvonimir
    Ananda, Roshan Arjun
    Barreiro, Yuli Viviana Fuentes
    Malih, Narges
    Dimcea, Daiana Anne-Marie
    Ordulj, Josipa
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Spezia, Matteo
    Zuljevic, Marija Franka
    Suto, Jelena
    Tancredi, Luca
    Pijuk, Andela
    Sammali, Susanna
    Iascone, Veronica
    von Groote, Thilo
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Puljak, Livia
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (03) : 430 - 440
  • [3] Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta-epidemiological study
    Detweiler, B. N.
    Kollmorgen, L. E.
    Umberham, B. A.
    Hedin, R. J.
    Vassar, B. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (08) : 955 - 968
  • [4] CONSORT statement adherence and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on deep caries management: a meta-research
    Elagami, Rokaia Ahmed
    Reis, Thais Marchezini
    Hassan, Mohamed Ahmed
    Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
    Braga, Mariana Minatel
    Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
    Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
    Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [5] Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias
    Knobloch, Karsten
    Yoon, Uzung
    Vogt, Peter M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 39 (02) : 91 - 92
  • [6] Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study
    Nothacker, Julia
    Stadelmaier, Julia
    Siemens, Waldemar
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Schmucker, Christine
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05): : e060255
  • [7] UPTAKE OF THE PRISMA 2020 STATEMENT AND ITS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPONENT IN RECENTLY PUBLISHED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Cichewicz, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S405 - S405
  • [8] Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study
    Sargeant, Jan M.
    Reynolds, Kristen
    Winder, Charlotte B.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 195
  • [9] Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Panic, Nikola
    Leoncini, Emanuele
    de Belvis, Giulio
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Boccia, Stefania
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [10] NEgatiVE results in Radiomics research (NEVER): A meta-research study of publication bias in leading radiology journals
    Kocak, Burak
    Bulut, Elif
    Bayrak, Osman Nuri
    Okumus, Ahmet Arda
    Altun, Omer
    Arvas, Zeynep Borekci
    Kavukoglu, Irem
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 163
12345