Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study

被引：19
|
作者：
Innocenti, Tiziano [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Feller, Daniel [3 ]
Giagio, Silvia [4 ,5 ]
Salvioli, Stefano [2 ,6 ]
Minnucci, Silvia [7 ]
Brindisino, Fabrizio [7 ,8 ]
Cosentino, Carola [6 ]
Piano, Leonardo [9 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [1 ,10 ]
Ostelo, Raymond [1 ,11 ]
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Fac Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] GIMBE Fdn, Bologna, Italy
[3] Prov Agcy Hlth Autonomous Prov Trento, Trento, Italy
[4] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Bologna, Div Occupat Med, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[6] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[7] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Clin Sci & Translat Med, Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy
[9] Fdn Santi Lorenzo & Teobaldo, Unit Rehabil & Funct Recovery, Rodello, Italy
[10] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[11] Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[12] De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词：
Meta-research; Randomised controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Reporting guidelines; Research quality; Risk of bias; REPORTING QUALITY; METAANALYSES; GUIDELINES; TRIALS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100450
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are essential resources for the clini-cians. They allow to evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of the evidence to support clini-cal decision-making if they are adequately reported. Little is known in the rehabilitation field about the completeness of reporting of SRs and its relationship with the risk of bias (ROB). Objectives: Primary: 1) To evaluate the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews (SRs) published in rehabilitation journals by evaluating their adherence to the PRISMA 2009 checklist, 2) To investigate the relationship between ROB and completeness of reporting. Secondary: To study the association between completeness of reporting and journals and study characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED IN THE ADHERENCE TO THE TRIPOD STATEMENT FOR CLINICAL PREDICTION MODELS FOR PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS: A META-RESEARCH STUDY
    Feller, Daniel
    Wingbermuhle, Roel
    Berg, Bjornar
    Vigdal, Orjan
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Grotle, Margreth
    Ostelo, Raymond
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S526 - S527
  • [22] Overadjustment bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of socio-economic inequalities in health: a meta-research scoping review
    van Zwieten, Anita
    Dai, Jiahui
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Wong, Germaine
    Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (01)
  • [23] Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study
    Shruti Jayakumar
    Viknesh Sounderajah
    Pasha Normahani
    Leanne Harling
    Sheraz R. Markar
    Hutan Ashrafian
    Ara Darzi
    npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [24] Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study
    Jayakumar, Shruti
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Normahani, Pasha
    Harling, Leanne
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [25] Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta- research Study
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Giagio, Silvia
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Feller, Daniel
    Minnucci, Silvia
    Brindisino, Fabrizio
    Ijzelenberg, Wilhelmina
    Ostelo, Raymond
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (09): : 1839 - 1847
  • [26] Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
    Tam, Wilson W. S.
    Tang, Arthur
    Woo, Brigitte
    Goh, Shawn Y. S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [27] Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study
    Bojcic, Ruzica
    Todoric, Mate
    Puljak, Livia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 165
  • [28] Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study
    Siemens, Waldemar
    Nothacker, Julia
    Stadelmaier, Julia
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Schmucker, Christine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 152 : 36 - 46
  • [29] Conclusiveness of Cochrane systematic reviews is low but accumulating across time in physical therapy: A meta-research study
    Freire, Ana Paula Coelho Figueira
    Eustis, Kailei J.
    Lemes, Italo Ribeiro
    Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti
    Smilanich, Gordon
    Elkins, Mark
    Pinto, Rafael Zambelli
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2025, 29 (03)
  • [30] Declaration of use and appropriate use of reporting guidelines in high- impact rehabilitation journals is limited: a meta-research study
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Giagio, Silvia
    Feller, Daniel
    Cartabellotta, Nino
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 131 : 43 - 50
12345