Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study

被引：19

作者：

Innocenti, Tiziano ^{[1
,2
,12
]}

Feller, Daniel ^{[3
]}

Giagio, Silvia ^{[4
,5
]}

Salvioli, Stefano ^{[2
,6
]}

Minnucci, Silvia ^{[7
]}

Brindisino, Fabrizio ^{[7
,8
]}

Cosentino, Carola ^{[6
]}

Piano, Leonardo ^{[9
]}

Chiarotto, Alessandro ^{[1
,10
]}

Ostelo, Raymond ^{[1
,11
]}

机构：

[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Fac Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[2] GIMBE Fdn, Bologna, Italy

[3] Prov Agcy Hlth Autonomous Prov Trento, Trento, Italy

[4] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Bologna, Div Occupat Med, Bologna, Italy

[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy

[6] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy

[7] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Clin Sci & Translat Med, Rome, Italy

[8] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy

[9] Fdn Santi Lorenzo & Teobaldo, Unit Rehabil & Funct Recovery, Rodello, Italy

[10] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

[11] Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[12] De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands

来源：

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 05期

关键词：

Meta-research; Randomised controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Reporting guidelines; Research quality; Risk of bias; REPORTING QUALITY; METAANALYSES; GUIDELINES; TRIALS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100450

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are essential resources for the clini-cians. They allow to evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of the evidence to support clini-cal decision-making if they are adequately reported. Little is known in the rehabilitation field about the completeness of reporting of SRs and its relationship with the risk of bias (ROB). Objectives: Primary: 1) To evaluate the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews (SRs) published in rehabilitation journals by evaluating their adherence to the PRISMA 2009 checklist, 2) To investigate the relationship between ROB and completeness of reporting. Secondary: To study the association between completeness of reporting and journals and study characteristics.

引用

页数：9

共 50 条

[31] Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
Van Thu Nguyen
Engleton, Mishelle
Davison, Mauricia
Ravaud, Philippe
Porcher, Raphael
Boutron, Isabelle
BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
[32] Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
Van Thu Nguyen
Mishelle Engleton
Mauricia Davison
Philippe Ravaud
Raphael Porcher
Isabelle Boutron
BMC Medicine, 19
[33] AMSTAR 2 is only partially applicable to systematic reviews of non-intervention studies: a meta-research study
Puljak, Livia
Bala, Malgorzata M.
Mathes, Tim
Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
Wegewitz, Uta
Faggion Jr, Clovis M.
Matthias, Katja
Storman, Dawid
Zajac, Joanna
Rombey, Tanja
Bruschettini, Matteo
Pieper, Dawid
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 163 : 11 - 20
[34] Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement? (vol 269, pg 413, 2013)
不详
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (01) : 304 - 304
[35] Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals
Marija Franka Marušić
Mahir Fidahić
Cristina Mihaela Cepeha
Loredana Gabriela Farcaș
Alexandra Tseke
Livia Puljak
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
[36] One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study
Gianola, Silvia
Bargeri, Silvia
Nembrini, Giulia
Varvello, Arianna
Lunny, Carole
Castellini, Greta
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (03): : 410 - 417
[37] Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals
Marusic, Marija Franka
Fidahic, Mahir
Cepeha, Cristina Mihaela
Farcas, Loredana Gabriela
Tseke, Alexandra
Puljak, Livia
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[38] Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study
Tsujimoto, Yasushi
Tsujimoto, Hiraku
Kataoka, Yuki
Kimachi, Miho
Shimizu, Sayaka
Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
Fukuma, Shingo
Yamamoto, Yosuke
Fukuhara, Shunichi
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 84 : 54 - 60
[39] Certainty of Evidence Assessment in Systematic Reviews Published by High-Impact Sports Science Journals: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Siedler, Madelin R.
Harris, Katie N.
Rodriguez, Christian
Lewis, Megan H.
Semidey-Lamadrid, Priscila
Stratton, Matthew T.
Blacutt, Miguel
Hosseini, Zeinab
Falck-Ytter, Yngve
Mustafa, Reem A.
Sultan, Shahnaz
Dahm, Philipp
Morgan, Rebecca L.
Murad, M. Hassan
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 54 (02) : 473 - 484
[40] Certainty of Evidence Assessment in Systematic Reviews Published by High-Impact Sports Science Journals: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Madelin R. Siedler
Katie N. Harris
Christian Rodriguez
Megan H. Lewis
Priscila Semidey-Lamadrid
Matthew T. Stratton
Miguel Blacutt
Zeinab Hosseini
Yngve Falck-Ytter
Reem A. Mustafa
Shahnaz Sultan
Philipp Dahm
Rebecca L. Morgan
M. Hassan Murad
Sports Medicine, 2024, 54 (2) : 473 - 484

← 1 2 3 4 5 →