Recommendations from Cochrane reviews for improving future trials on anesthesia and pain: a meta-research study

被引:3
|
作者
Runjic, Renata [1 ]
Plenkovic, Mia [2 ]
Pirosca, Stefania [3 ]
Clarke, Mike [4 ]
Treweek, Shaun [5 ]
Puljak, Livia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[2] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med Med Sci Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Northern Ireland Methodol Hub, Belfast, North Ireland
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
anesthesia; Cochrane systematic review; implications for research; pain; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2022-0042
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) have a section 'Implications for research' where authors make suggestions for improving future research. The authors of the present study assessed the prevalence and time dynamics of different recommendations in the CSRs about anesthesia and pain. Methods: The authors included all CSRs published by the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group and Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group before 17 July 2020. The authors analyzed recommendations for improving future research listed in the 'Implications for research' section of these CSRs and categorized recommendations for improvements. Results: They analyzed 370 reviews. Four categories of recommendations were present in more than 40% of the reviews. Most reviews recommended a larger sample size and better outcome choice, study design and choice of future intervention. These recommendations gradually increased in frequency in the Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group and mainly decreased in the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Conclusion: Recommendations from CSRs offer useful advice for trialists designing new trials.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methodological and reporting quality of Latin American randomized controlled trials in surgery from 2012 to 2022: a meta-research study
    Lozada-Martinez, Ivan D.
    Visconti-Lopez, Fabriccio J.
    Rojas-Cueva, Alexandra C.
    Ausejo, Franco
    Castrillon-Lozano, Jorge
    Pedroza, Nicolas A. Canas
    Ordonez, Ruth L. Yela
    Garcia, Alexandra Mutis
    Santana, Benjamin Ortiz
    Diazgranados-Garcia, Maria C.
    Acevedo-Parrales, Danilo
    Delgado, Patricia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2025, 63 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [32] Evaluating agreement between evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition: a meta-research replication study
    Stadelmaier, Julia
    Beyerbach, Jessica
    Roux, Isabelle
    Harms, Louisa
    Eble, Julian
    Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
    Schwingshackl, Lukas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 39 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [33] Evaluating agreement between evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition: a meta-research replication study
    Julia Stadelmaier
    Jessica Beyerbach
    Isabelle Roux
    Louisa Harms
    Julian Eble
    Adriani Nikolakopoulou
    Lukas Schwingshackl
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2024, 39 : 363 - 378
  • [34] EXERCISE VERSUS ANALGESICS FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN: A META-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Henriksen, M.
    Hansen, J. B.
    Klokker, L.
    Bliddal, H.
    Christensen, R.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2015, 23 : A172 - A172
  • [35] One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study
    Gianola, Silvia
    Bargeri, Silvia
    Nembrini, Giulia
    Varvello, Arianna
    Lunny, Carole
    Castellini, Greta
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (03): : 410 - 417
  • [36] What can be learned from Cochrane systematic reviews of massage that can guide future research?
    Ezzo, Jeanette
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2007, 13 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [37] Comparable effects of exercise and analgesics for pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of trials included in Cochrane systematic reviews
    Henriksen, Marius
    Hansen, Julie B.
    Klokker, Louise
    Bliddal, Henning
    Christensen, Robin
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (04) : 417 - 431
  • [38] AMSTAR 2 is only partially applicable to systematic reviews of non-intervention studies: a meta-research study
    Puljak, Livia
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Mathes, Tim
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Wegewitz, Uta
    Faggion Jr, Clovis M.
    Matthias, Katja
    Storman, Dawid
    Zajac, Joanna
    Rombey, Tanja
    Bruschettini, Matteo
    Pieper, Dawid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 163 : 11 - 20
  • [39] In trials of physiotherapy for chronic low back pain, clinical relevance is rarely interpreted, with great heterogeneity in the frameworks and thresholds used: a meta-research study
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Schleimer, Tim
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Giagio, Silvia
    Ostelo, Raymond
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2024, 70 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [40] A Critical Appraisal of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: A Meta-Research Study
    Mazzoleni, Gabriele Zambonin
    Bergna, Andrea
    Buffone, Francesca
    Sacchi, Andrea
    Misseroni, Serena
    Tramontano, Marco
    Dal Farra, Fulvio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (17)