Recommendations from Cochrane reviews for improving future trials on anesthesia and pain: a meta-research study

被引:3
|
作者
Runjic, Renata [1 ]
Plenkovic, Mia [2 ]
Pirosca, Stefania [3 ]
Clarke, Mike [4 ]
Treweek, Shaun [5 ]
Puljak, Livia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[2] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med Med Sci Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Northern Ireland Methodol Hub, Belfast, North Ireland
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
anesthesia; Cochrane systematic review; implications for research; pain; CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2022-0042
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) have a section 'Implications for research' where authors make suggestions for improving future research. The authors of the present study assessed the prevalence and time dynamics of different recommendations in the CSRs about anesthesia and pain. Methods: The authors included all CSRs published by the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group and Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group before 17 July 2020. The authors analyzed recommendations for improving future research listed in the 'Implications for research' section of these CSRs and categorized recommendations for improvements. Results: They analyzed 370 reviews. Four categories of recommendations were present in more than 40% of the reviews. Most reviews recommended a larger sample size and better outcome choice, study design and choice of future intervention. These recommendations gradually increased in frequency in the Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group and mainly decreased in the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Conclusion: Recommendations from CSRs offer useful advice for trialists designing new trials.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study
    Jayakumar, Shruti
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Normahani, Pasha
    Harling, Leanne
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [22] A meta-research study of randomized controlled trials found infrequent and delayed availability of protocols
    Schoenenberger, Christof Manuel
    Griessbach, Alexandra
    Heravi, Ala Taji
    Gryaznov, Dmitry
    Gloy, Viktoria L.
    Lohner, Szimonetta
    Klatte, Katharina
    Ghosh, Nilabh
    Lee, Hopin
    Mansouri, Anita
    Marian, Ioana R.
    Saccilotto, Ramon
    Nury, Edris
    Busse, Jason W.
    von Niederhausern, Belinda
    Mertz, Dominik
    Bluemle, Anette
    Odutayo, Ayodele
    Hopewell, Sally
    Speich, Benjamin
    Briel, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 149 : 45 - 52
  • [23] Some Cochrane risk-of-bias items are not important in osteoarthritis trials: a meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews
    Bolvig, Julie
    Juhl, Carsten B.
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Tugwell, Peter
    Ghogomu, Elizabeth A. T.
    Pardo, Jordi Pardo
    Rader, Tamara
    Wells, George A.
    Mayhew, Alain
    Maxwell, Lara
    Lund, Hans
    Bliddal, Henning
    Christensen, Robin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 95 : 128 - 136
  • [24] A Review of Neurosurgical randomized controlled trials in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Key Findings and Implications for Future Research
    Thompson, Daniel
    Williams, Adam
    Hutchinson, Peter
    Helmy, Adel
    Cromwell, David
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 194
  • [25] Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study
    Nothacker, Julia
    Stadelmaier, Julia
    Siemens, Waldemar
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Schmucker, Christine
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05): : e060255
  • [26] Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
    Roseman, Michelle
    Turner, Erick H.
    Lexchin, Joel
    Coyne, James C.
    Bero, Lisa A.
    Thombs, Brett D.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [27] Methods Used for Enhancing the Bioavailability of Oral Curcumin in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Research Study
    Mimica, Bruna
    Popovic, Viljemka Bucevic
    Banjari, Ines
    Kadic, Antonia Jelicic
    Puljak, Livia
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2022, 15 (08)
  • [28] Most physical interventions for musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents cannot be reproduced in clinical practice: a meta-research study of randomized clinical trials
    Figueiredo, Carolina G.
    Santos, Veronica S.
    Madureira, Eduarda Vianna
    Antunes, Jessica Silva
    Santo, Caique do Espirito
    Leite, Mariana N.
    Yamato, Tie P.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [29] Conclusions of clinical trials assessing monoclonal antibodies and sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: a meta-research study
    Ornelas, Rachel Campos
    Pazini, Debora de Souza
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
    Riera, Rachel
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70 (11):
  • [30] Pilot and feasibility trials in surgery are incompletely reported according to the CONSORT checklist: a meta-research study
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Kazi, Tania
    Wang, Austine
    Zhang, Sophia
    Thabane, Alex
    Nanji, Keean
    Staibano, Phillip
    Park, Lily J.
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    Thabane, Lehana
    Parpia, Sameer
    Bhandari, Mohit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 170