Scatter Correction Requirements for Likelihood-Based Attenuation Artifact Correction in PET

被引:5
|
作者
Laymon, C. M. [1 ]
Bowsher, J. E. [2 ]
Carney, J. P. J. [1 ]
Blodgett, T. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
Positron emission tomography; Xray tomography; Image reconstruction; Attenuation measurement;
D O I
10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.354340
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Artifacts have been observed in CT-based, 511keV attenuation images for PET attenuation correction. Artifact detection and correction algorithms are being developed based on the Poisson loglikelihood function (LLF). The LLF quantifies the level of consistency between an activity and attenuation image pair and the measured emission sinogram. We have shown that the LLF can discriminate more-artifactual from less-artifactual attenuation images at clinical noise levels. Here we use a digital anthropomorphic phantom to examine the effect of scatter on LLF performance. Base sinograms were formed by forward projecting a true activity distribution through a true attenuation distribution. Scatter was simulated by filtering the base sinograms. Noise was considered by producing 128 Poisson-randomized variates of the filtered base sinograms for each of 7 assumed count levels. An artifactual attenuation image was produced by modifying mu-values of regions of the true attenuation image. For each sinogram, two OSEM reconstructions were performed and two LLF values obtained using the artifactual and true attenuation. Accuracy was calculated as the fraction of cases in which the LLF preferred the artifact-free attenuation image. Additional studies were performed to test several scatter correction procedures. Findings show that scatter may render the LLF unreliable even in the limit of high-count scans but that its usefulness is restored by applying an appropriate correction.
引用
收藏
页码:2151 / 2154
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN INVESTIGATION OF SCATTER IN ATTENUATION CORRECTION FOR PET
    DIGBY, WM
    HOFFMAN, EJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1989, 36 (01) : 1038 - 1042
  • [2] Accuracy of Scatter and Attenuation Correction in PET Imaging
    Chang, T.
    Chang, G.
    Clark, J.
    Mawlawi, O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [3] Attenuation Correction for a Generalized Scatter Reconstruction in PET
    Sun, Hongyan
    Pisotrius, Stephen
    2013 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2013,
  • [4] Anomaly Detection and Artifact Recovery in PET Attenuation-Correction Images Using the Likelihood Function
    Laymon, Charles M.
    Bowsher, James E.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 7 (01) : 137 - 146
  • [5] The Effect of Attenuation and Scatter Correction in Rat Brain PET
    Yu, A. Ram
    Kim, Jin Su
    Moon, Jisook
    Kim, Hee Joung
    Lim, Sang Moo
    Kim, Kyeong Min
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2013, 60 (02) : 751 - 757
  • [6] Simultaneous attenuation and scatter correction by restoration in PET imaging
    Bentourkia, M
    Sarrhini, O
    2004 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 3712 - 3715
  • [7] Iterative scatter correction based on artifact assessment
    Wiegert, Jens
    Hohmann, Steffen
    Bertram, Matthias
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
  • [8] Evaluation of Attenuation and Scatter Correction Requirements as a Function of Object Size in PET Small Animal Imaging
    Konik, A.
    Koesters, T.
    Madsen, M. T.
    Sunderland, J. J.
    2010 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2010, : 3458 - 3465
  • [9] Evaluation of Attenuation and Scatter Correction Requirements as a Function of Object Size in Small Animal PET Imaging
    Konik, A.
    Koesters, T.
    Madsen, M. T.
    Sunderland, J. J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2011, 58 (05) : 2308 - 2314
  • [10] Contrast artifact correction in CT-based attenuation correction
    Chen, T.
    Lin, H. H.
    Chuang, K. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 : S285 - S285