A simulation of the effects of set-up error and changes in breast volume on conventional and intensity-modulated treatments in breast radiotherapy

被引:16
|
作者
Hector, C
Webb, S
Evans, PM
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2001年 / 46卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/309
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The effect of interfractional patient movement on dosimetry has been investigated for breast radiotherapy. Errors in patient set-up and changes in breast volume were simulated individually to determine how each contributes to the total dosimetric error. Two treatment techniques were investigated: a conventional treatment and an intensity-modulated treatment delivered using compensators. Six patients were investigated and anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) displacements were simulated by displacing the isocentre in both directions by 2, 5 and 10 mm. A model of the breast was developed from the six patients to simulate changes in breast volume. In this model, the breast was described as a set of semi-ellipses. The volume of the breast was changed by varying the magnitude of the semi-major and semi-minor axes. Anisotropic changes in breast volume were also investigated. The dosimetric error was evaluated for each dose plan by calculating the volume outside the 95-105% dose range resulting from the simulations. A number of parameters describing the size and shape of the breast were also investigated to determine whether a susceptibility of outline sets to interfractional patient movement could be predicted. A parameter describing the increase in the breast volume outside the 95-105% dose range was calculated for AP and SI set-up errors of +/-3 mm and changes in breast volume of 5%. Results revealed that set-up errors were likely to cause larger increases in the volume outside the 95-105% dose range than changes in breast volume for typical set-up errors and changes in breast volume that occur during treatment. The magnitude of the set-up errors and changes in breast volume were observed to be dependent on the shape outline set. Statistically significant linear correlation was observed between the increase in the volume outside the 95-105% dose range and several of the evaluation parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1471
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer
    Liu, Yi-Chi
    Chang, Hung-Ming
    Lin, Hsin-Hon
    Lu, Chia-Chun
    Lai, Lu-Han
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 14
  • [32] Dosimetric Validation of Surface Guided Patient Set-Up for Breast Radiotherapy
    Gopal, A.
    Lasio, G.
    Zhang, B.
    Xu, H.
    Chen, S.
    Mcavoy, S.
    Decesaris, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [33] AUTOMATED PLANNING OF TANGENTIAL BREAST INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY USING HEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION
    Purdie, Thomas G.
    Dinniwell, Robert E.
    Letourneau, Daniel
    Hill, Christine
    Sharpe, Michael B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : 575 - 583
  • [34] PREDICTORS FOR CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
    Reeder, Reed
    Carter, Dennis L.
    Howell, Kathryn
    Henkenberns, Phyllis
    Tallhamer, Michael
    Johnson, Tim
    Kercher, Jane
    Widner, Jodi
    Kaske, Terese
    Paul, Devchand
    Sedlacek, Scot
    Leonard, Charles E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (01): : 92 - 97
  • [35] Workload of breast image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered with TomoTherapy
    Rosalinda, Ricotti
    Eleonora, Miglietta
    Cristina, Leonardi Maria
    Federica, Cattani
    Samantha, Dicuonzo
    Patricia, Rojas Damaris
    Giulia, Marvaso
    Roberto, Orecchia
    Alicjala, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2020, 106 (06): : 518 - 523
  • [36] Skin Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Field-In-Field Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Helical Inverse Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial
    Joseph, K.
    Vos, L. J.
    Gabos, Z.
    Pervez, N.
    Chafe, S.
    Tankel, K.
    Warkentin, H.
    Ghosh, S.
    Amanie, J.
    Powell, K.
    Polkosnik, L-A
    Horsman, S.
    MacKenzie, M.
    Sabri, S.
    Parliament, M. B.
    Mackey, J.
    Abdulkarim, B.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [37] Comesis in patients with breast neoplasia submitted to the hypofractionated radiotherapy with of intensity-modulated beam
    Miranda, Fabiana Accioli
    Lannes Vieira, Marina Tamm
    de Moraes, Fabio Ynoe
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Carvalho, Heloisa de Andrade
    Hanna, Samir Abdallah
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 64 (11): : 1023 - 1030
  • [38] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning from limited anatomical information: Is Sim-CT sufficient for planning women with breast cancer receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
    Trouncer, RJ
    Rowbottom, CG
    Budgell, GJ
    Mackay, RI
    Magee, B
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 17 (05) : 343 - 351
  • [39] Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Zhang, Xiang
    Shan, Guo-ping
    Liu, Ji-ping
    Wang, Bin-bing
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5 : 1 - 9
  • [40] BREAST AND SUPRA-CLAVICULAR RADIOTHERAPY SET-UP: A PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF PRACTICE
    O'Neill, A.
    Dunn, M.
    Archer, L.
    Brown, K.
    Simpson, B.
    Robinson, J.
    Irvine, D.
    O'Sullivan, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S226 - S227