Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production - The Impact of Feed Choice (12 pp)
    Ingrid Strid Eriksson
    Helena Elmquist
    Susanne Stern
    Thomas Nybrant
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2005, 10 : 143 - 154
  • [2] Environmental systems analysis of pig production - Development and application of tools for evaluation of the environmental impact of feed choice
    Eriksson, IS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (03): : 224 - 224
  • [3] Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production - Development and application of tools for evaluation of the environmental impact of feed choice - Doctoral dissertation. ISSN 1401-6249, ISBN 91-576-6771-3
    Ingrid Strid Eriksson
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2005, 10 : 224 - 224
  • [4] The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne
    van der Werf, HMG
    Petit, J
    Sanders, J
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 83 (02) : 153 - 177
  • [5] Can the environmental impact of pig systems be reduced by utilising co-products as feed?
    Mackenzie, S. G.
    Leinonen, I.
    Ferguson, N.
    Kyriazakis, I.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 115 : 172 - 181
  • [6] Environmental impact of pig meat production
    Backus, GBC
    van Wagenberg, CPA
    Verdoes, N
    MEAT SCIENCE, 1998, 49 : S65 - S72
  • [7] Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed
    Prabowo, A.
    Hayati, R. N.
    Ludfiani, D. D.
    Minarsih, S.
    Haryanto, B.
    Supriyo, A.
    Subiharta, S.
    Nurwahyuni, E.
    Hindarwati, Y.
    Setiapermas, M. N.
    Sudarto, S.
    Samijan, S.
    Utomo, B.
    Winarni, E.
    Suretno, N. D.
    Wibawa, W.
    Agustini, S.
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2024, 10 (02): : 743 - 758
  • [8] Environmental impact assessment of different cropping systems of home-grown feed for milk production
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Tamburini, Alberto
    Nonini, Luca
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Bava, Luciana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 3734 - 3746
  • [9] Environmental impact of the typical heavy pig production in Italy
    Bava, Luciana
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Tamburini, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 685 - 691
  • [10] The Impact of Feed Formulation and Feeding Methods on Pig and Poultry Production on the Environment
    Pomar, Candido
    Remus, Aline
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 124 - 124