Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pig production under different housing systems - An economic analysis
    Chandrahas
    Chabra, A. K.
    Abraham, John
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 83 (03): : 299 - 302
  • [42] Decreasing environmental footprints of dairy production systems through optimization of feed rations and origins
    Ma, Yifei
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhu, Xueqin
    Fang, Qunchao
    Oenema, Oene
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 461
  • [43] Environmental consequences of pig production scenarios using biomass from rotational grass-clover leys as feed
    Zira, Stanley
    Salomon, Eva
    Akerfeldt, Magdalena
    Roos, Elin
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2023, 30
  • [44] Evaluation of indicators to assess the environmental impact of dairy production systems
    Thomassen, MA
    de Boer, IJM
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 111 (1-4) : 185 - 199
  • [45] Environmental impact of tomato production under different hydroponic systems
    Tewolde, F. T.
    Takagaki, M.
    Oshio, T.
    Maruo, T.
    Kozai, T.
    Kikuchi, Y.
    XXIX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS ON HORTICULTURE: SUSTAINING LIVES, LIVELIHOODS AND LANDSCAPES (IHC2014): INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIA ON WATER, ECO-EFFICIENCY AND TRANSFORMATION OF ORGANIC WASTE IN HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTION, 2016, 1112 : 467 - 471
  • [46] Methodological approach to evaluate the environmental impact of livestock production systems
    WillekeWetstein, C
    Schmidt, A
    Abresch, JP
    Steinbach, J
    Bauer, S
    LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEMS: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT SOCIO-ECONOMICS AND THE LAND MANAGER, 1996, (79): : 187 - 199
  • [47] Environmental and resource-related impact of crop production systems
    Taube, F
    Loges, R
    Wachendorf, M
    PERSPECTIVES IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, 2003, : 39 - 51
  • [48] Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
    Meda, B.
    Garcia-Launay, F.
    Dusart, L.
    Ponchant, P.
    Espagnol, S.
    Wilfart, A.
    ANIMAL, 2021, 15 (01)
  • [49] Environmental assessment of Ronozyme® P5000 CT phytase as an alternative to inorganic phosphate supplementation to pig feed used in intensive pig production
    Per H. Nielsen
    Henrik Wenzel
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 514 - 520
  • [50] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF INTENSIVE PIG FARMS
    Pelaez Guilabert, F.
    Atienza Martinez, P. Y.
    Saenz Albanes, L. B.
    Amado Moreno, M. A.
    Delgado Aguilar, V.
    Valladolid Acosta, R.
    Rodriguez Herrera, E.
    Prieto Cordero, I. M.
    Garcia Barreto, J. F.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 : 292 - 293