Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] An approach to investigating the environmental impact of an outdoor pig production system
    Edwards, SA
    Watson, CA
    LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEMS, 1997, 89 : 335 - 340
  • [12] The Influence of Farm Characteristics and Feed Compositions on the Environmental Impact of Pig Production in Flanders: Productivity, Energy Use and Protein Choices Are Key
    Van Mierlo, Klara
    Baert, Louise
    Bracquene, Ellen
    De Tavernier, Johan
    Geeraerd, Annemie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [13] Methods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systems
    Basset-Mens, C.
    van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Robin, P.
    Morvan, Th.
    Hassouna, M.
    Paillat, J.-M.
    Vertes, F.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (15) : 1395 - 1405
  • [14] Analysis of the Sustainability of Fattening Systems for Iberian Traditional Pig Production through a Technical and Environmental Approach
    Garcia-Gudino, Javier
    Blanco-Penedo, Isabel
    Font-i-Furnols, Maria
    Angon, Elena
    Perea, Jose Manuel
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 13
  • [15] Environmental impact potential of insect production chains for food and feed in Europe
    Smetana, Sergiy
    Bhatia, Anita
    Batta, Uday
    Mouhrim, Nisrine
    Tonda, Alberto
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2023, 13 (04) : 112 - 120
  • [16] EARTHWORMS FOR FEED PRODUCTION FROM VEGETABLE WASTE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    Conti, Cecilia
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Tedesco, Doriana
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (10): : 2117 - 2122
  • [17] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice
    Clark, Michael
    Tilman, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [18] Reconsidering rumen microbial consortia to enhance feed efficiency and reduce environmental impact of ruminant livestock production systems
    Firkins, Jeffrey Lynn
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 39 : 445 - 457
  • [19] An environmental impact calculator for greenhouse production systems
    Torrellas, Malta
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Ignacio Montero, Juan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 118 : 186 - 195
  • [20] Environmental impact of different agricultural production systems
    Feitosa, Erialdo de Oliveira
    Lopes, Fernando Bezerra
    de Andrade, Eunice Maia
    Messias de Magalhaes, Ana Caroline
    Silva de Freitas, Cley Anderson
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2021, 52 (01): : 1 - 9