Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mitigating environmental impacts using net energy system in feed formulation in China's pig production
    Hu, Qile
    Shi, Huangwei
    Wang, Li
    Wang, Lu
    Hou, Yong
    Wang, Hongliang
    Lai, Changhua
    Zhang, Shuai
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 856
  • [32] Environmental impact of pig production affected by wet acid scrubber as mitigation technology
    Conti, Cecilia
    Costantini, Michele
    Fusi, Alessandra
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    Guarino, Marcella
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 580 - 590
  • [33] Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment
    Grunert, K. G.
    Sonntag, W. I.
    Glanz-Chanos, V.
    Forum, S.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 137 : 123 - 129
  • [34] A method to estimate the environmental impacts from genetic change in pig production systems
    Mathias Ottosen
    Stephen G. Mackenzie
    Michael Wallace
    Ilias Kyriazakis
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 523 - 537
  • [35] A method to estimate the environmental impacts from genetic change in pig production systems
    Ottosen, Mathias
    Mackenzie, Stephen G.
    Wallace, Michael
    Kyriazakis, Ilias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (03): : 523 - 537
  • [36] Evaluation of different pig production systems including economic, welfare and environmental aspects
    Krieter, J
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2002, 45 (03): : 223 - 235
  • [37] Environmental, economic and social analysis of peri-urban pig production
    Wei, S.
    Bai, Z. H.
    Qin, W.
    Xia, L. J.
    Oenema, O.
    Jiang, R. F.
    Ma, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 129 : 596 - 607
  • [38] Effects of probiotics and zinc as feed supplements in pig production
    Bednorz, Carmen
    Guenther, Sebastian
    Wieler, Lothar H.
    TIERAERZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 2014, 69 (08) : 334 - 339
  • [39] Sources of Feed Supply in Comparison with the Effectiveness of Pig Production
    Szymanska, Elzbieta
    ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, 2008, (16): : 188 - 195
  • [40] Impact of feed type, environmental conditions, and pesticide usage on the growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus during feed storage
    Gao, Jing
    Guo, Qi
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Jiahui
    Wang, Peiya
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2025, 112