Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed

被引:0
|
作者
Prabowo, A. [1 ]
Hayati, R. N. [2 ]
Ludfiani, D. D. [1 ]
Minarsih, S. [3 ]
Haryanto, B. [1 ]
Supriyo, A. [3 ]
Subiharta, S. [2 ]
Nurwahyuni, E. [3 ]
Hindarwati, Y. [3 ]
Setiapermas, M. N. [3 ]
Sudarto, S. [4 ]
Samijan, S. [3 ]
Utomo, B. [5 ]
Winarni, E. [3 ]
Suretno, N. D. [1 ]
Wibawa, W. [4 ]
Agustini, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assessm, Manado, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Anim Husb, Manado, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Food Crops, Manado, Indonesia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Hort & Estate Crops, Cibinong, Indonesia
[5] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Social Welf Village & Connect, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Feed; Food; Multidimensional scaling; Sorghum; Sustainability; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; DIGESTIBILITY;
D O I
10.22035/gjesm.2024.02.20
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sorghum is a grain-producing commodity with the seeds being a food source, while the leaves, stems, and bran serve as animal feed. The productivity depends on the specific variety, environment, infrastructure, and technology used. Sorghum cultivation in Indonesia is carried out primarily using agroforestry or monoculture. Despite not being as popular compared to rice and corn due to the prevalence of these staples in Indonesian diets, sorghum has the potential to replace corn because its cultivation is easier and the results are more profitable. Therefore, this study aimed to determine sustainability index and potential of sorghum for food and feed by identifying dimensions and attributes that influence sustainability.METHODS: This study was conducted at Raji, Demak, Central Java, Indonesia in October 2023. Data were collected through focus group discussions and structural questionnaires consisting of 28 attributes associated with environmental, social, economic, and technological dimensions. Multidimensional scaling method and Rapfish software were used for data analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was used to ascertain sustainability level and attributes leverage, as well as check errors and variations in assessment.FINDINGS: The results showed that sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was 79.67, categorized as very sustainable. Analysis across four dimensions showed that the social dimension had the highest (83.80) sustainability index, followed by the technological (82.28), economical (77.46), and environmental (75.15) dimensions. A total of 12 attributes were found to greatly affect sustainability. These included land availability, the efficiency of water used, the prevention of natural resource exploitation, motivation level, minimal interference with primary agricultural activities, community acceptance, productivity, sales profit level, ease of sale and cultivation, tools availability, and technological sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was categorized as very sustainable with a value of 79.67. This index consisted of the environmental (75.15), social (83.80), economical (77.46), and technological dimensions (82.28). The average productivity at the study site was 6-7 tons per hectare (tons/ha), with a production potency of 300-350 tons/year. Additionally, the potency of sorghum stover production was 471.8 ton per year of dry matter and could be used as feed for 163 animal units/year.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 758
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Bioplastic Production from Food Waste
    Synani, Katerina
    Abeliotis, Konstadinos
    Velonia, Kelly
    Maragkaki, Angeliki
    Manios, Thrassyvoulos
    Lasaridi, Katia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [2] Environmental sustainability of milk production: a comparative environmental impact analysis and sustainability evaluation
    Singh, Alok Bihari
    Bhakar, Vikrant
    Gaurav, Gaurav
    Khandelwal, Chandni
    Sarkar, Prabir
    Singh, Harpreet
    Dangayach, Govind Sharan
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5
  • [3] Environmental impact potential of insect production chains for food and feed in Europe
    Smetana, Sergiy
    Bhatia, Anita
    Batta, Uday
    Mouhrim, Nisrine
    Tonda, Alberto
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2023, 13 (04) : 112 - 120
  • [4] Nanoparticles in agriculture: balancing food security and environmental sustainability
    Saburi Abimbola Atanda
    Rafiu Olarewaju Shaibu
    Foluso Oyedotun Agunbiade
    Discover Agriculture, 3 (1):
  • [5] Production losses in Russian agriculture: Impact on food security and environmental sustainability
    Karlova, Natalia A.
    Payurova, Elena N.
    Galaktionova, Ekaterina A.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2024, (11): : 76 - 89
  • [6] The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
    Arnold van Huis
    Dennis G. A. B. Oonincx
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2017, 37
  • [7] The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
    van Huis, Arnold
    Oonincx, Dennis G. A. B.
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (05)
  • [8] Balancing food security and environmental sustainability by optimizing seasonal-spatial crop production in Bangladesh
    Li, Man
    Guo, Zhe
    Zhang, Wei
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (07)
  • [9] Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice
    Eriksson, IS
    Elmquist, H
    Stern, S
    Nybrant, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (02): : 143 - 154
  • [10] Environmental Sustainability of Food Production in the Czech Republic
    Chlachula, Jiri
    Sefcik, Vladimir
    Lukaskova, Eva
    ICEEM 2012: 2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1, 2012, : 32 - +