Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed

被引:0
|
作者
Prabowo, A. [1 ]
Hayati, R. N. [2 ]
Ludfiani, D. D. [1 ]
Minarsih, S. [3 ]
Haryanto, B. [1 ]
Supriyo, A. [3 ]
Subiharta, S. [2 ]
Nurwahyuni, E. [3 ]
Hindarwati, Y. [3 ]
Setiapermas, M. N. [3 ]
Sudarto, S. [4 ]
Samijan, S. [3 ]
Utomo, B. [5 ]
Winarni, E. [3 ]
Suretno, N. D. [1 ]
Wibawa, W. [4 ]
Agustini, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assessm, Manado, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Anim Husb, Manado, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Food Crops, Manado, Indonesia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Hort & Estate Crops, Cibinong, Indonesia
[5] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Social Welf Village & Connect, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Feed; Food; Multidimensional scaling; Sorghum; Sustainability; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; DIGESTIBILITY;
D O I
10.22035/gjesm.2024.02.20
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sorghum is a grain-producing commodity with the seeds being a food source, while the leaves, stems, and bran serve as animal feed. The productivity depends on the specific variety, environment, infrastructure, and technology used. Sorghum cultivation in Indonesia is carried out primarily using agroforestry or monoculture. Despite not being as popular compared to rice and corn due to the prevalence of these staples in Indonesian diets, sorghum has the potential to replace corn because its cultivation is easier and the results are more profitable. Therefore, this study aimed to determine sustainability index and potential of sorghum for food and feed by identifying dimensions and attributes that influence sustainability.METHODS: This study was conducted at Raji, Demak, Central Java, Indonesia in October 2023. Data were collected through focus group discussions and structural questionnaires consisting of 28 attributes associated with environmental, social, economic, and technological dimensions. Multidimensional scaling method and Rapfish software were used for data analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was used to ascertain sustainability level and attributes leverage, as well as check errors and variations in assessment.FINDINGS: The results showed that sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was 79.67, categorized as very sustainable. Analysis across four dimensions showed that the social dimension had the highest (83.80) sustainability index, followed by the technological (82.28), economical (77.46), and environmental (75.15) dimensions. A total of 12 attributes were found to greatly affect sustainability. These included land availability, the efficiency of water used, the prevention of natural resource exploitation, motivation level, minimal interference with primary agricultural activities, community acceptance, productivity, sales profit level, ease of sale and cultivation, tools availability, and technological sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was categorized as very sustainable with a value of 79.67. This index consisted of the environmental (75.15), social (83.80), economical (77.46), and technological dimensions (82.28). The average productivity at the study site was 6-7 tons per hectare (tons/ha), with a production potency of 300-350 tons/year. Additionally, the potency of sorghum stover production was 471.8 ton per year of dry matter and could be used as feed for 163 animal units/year.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 758
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental systems analysis of pig production - Development and application of tools for evaluation of the environmental impact of feed choice
    Eriksson, IS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (03): : 224 - 224
  • [22] Integrating environmental footprints and planetary boundaries for assessing environmental sustainability in food production
    Li, Xin
    Wang, Xinyu
    Engel, Bernard A.
    Hua, En
    Sun, Shikun
    Wu, Pute
    Wang, Yubao
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 48 : 205 - 218
  • [23] Sustainability Index to Assess the Environmental Impact of Heat Supply Systems
    Hehenberger-Risse, Diana
    Straub, Julia
    Niechoj, Diana
    Lutzenberger, Alexa
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 42 (09) : 1923 - 1927
  • [24] A balancing act: the interplay of food supply chain resilience and environmental sustainability in American cities
    Gomez, Michael
    Grady, Caitlin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (12)
  • [25] Environmental Impact Assessment for a Unit of Food Aromas and Essences Production Using the Global Pollution Index
    Zaharia, Carmen
    Suteu, Daniela
    Macoveanu, Matei
    ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2010, 15 (05): : 5552 - 5558
  • [26] BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY INDEX: AN ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY
    de Carvalho Filho, Mario
    Pimentel, Marcio Sampaio
    Jose Bertino, Rafaela Maria
    de Lima Oliveira, Analia Regina
    REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTABIL, 2018, 10 (01): : 104 - 120
  • [27] Assessing Environmental and Economic Sustainability: Valorizing Grape Stems for Animal Feed Production
    Dilek, Filiz B.
    San Martin, David
    Gutierrez, Monica
    Ibarruri, Jone
    Inarra, Bruno
    Yetis, Ulku
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (50): : 18028 - 18042
  • [28] Genetic and environmental impact on iron, zinc, and phytate in food sorghum grown in Benin
    Kayodé, APP
    Linnemann, AR
    Hounhouigan, JD
    Nout, MJR
    Van Boekel, MAJS
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (01) : 256 - 262
  • [29] Impact of consumer behaviour on the environmental sustainability profile of food production and consumption chains – a case study on chicken meat
    Cooreman-Algoed, Margot
    Boone, Lieselot
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Van Hemelryck, Steven
    Brunson, Aurore
    Dewulf, Jo
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 178
  • [30] Assessing the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Functional Food Ingredient Production Process
    Priyadarshini, Anushree
    Tiwari, Brijesh K.
    Rajauria, Gaurav
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (03)