Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed

被引:0
|
作者
Prabowo, A. [1 ]
Hayati, R. N. [2 ]
Ludfiani, D. D. [1 ]
Minarsih, S. [3 ]
Haryanto, B. [1 ]
Supriyo, A. [3 ]
Subiharta, S. [2 ]
Nurwahyuni, E. [3 ]
Hindarwati, Y. [3 ]
Setiapermas, M. N. [3 ]
Sudarto, S. [4 ]
Samijan, S. [3 ]
Utomo, B. [5 ]
Winarni, E. [3 ]
Suretno, N. D. [1 ]
Wibawa, W. [4 ]
Agustini, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assessm, Manado, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Anim Husb, Manado, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Food Crops, Manado, Indonesia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Hort & Estate Crops, Cibinong, Indonesia
[5] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Social Welf Village & Connect, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Feed; Food; Multidimensional scaling; Sorghum; Sustainability; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; DIGESTIBILITY;
D O I
10.22035/gjesm.2024.02.20
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sorghum is a grain-producing commodity with the seeds being a food source, while the leaves, stems, and bran serve as animal feed. The productivity depends on the specific variety, environment, infrastructure, and technology used. Sorghum cultivation in Indonesia is carried out primarily using agroforestry or monoculture. Despite not being as popular compared to rice and corn due to the prevalence of these staples in Indonesian diets, sorghum has the potential to replace corn because its cultivation is easier and the results are more profitable. Therefore, this study aimed to determine sustainability index and potential of sorghum for food and feed by identifying dimensions and attributes that influence sustainability.METHODS: This study was conducted at Raji, Demak, Central Java, Indonesia in October 2023. Data were collected through focus group discussions and structural questionnaires consisting of 28 attributes associated with environmental, social, economic, and technological dimensions. Multidimensional scaling method and Rapfish software were used for data analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was used to ascertain sustainability level and attributes leverage, as well as check errors and variations in assessment.FINDINGS: The results showed that sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was 79.67, categorized as very sustainable. Analysis across four dimensions showed that the social dimension had the highest (83.80) sustainability index, followed by the technological (82.28), economical (77.46), and environmental (75.15) dimensions. A total of 12 attributes were found to greatly affect sustainability. These included land availability, the efficiency of water used, the prevention of natural resource exploitation, motivation level, minimal interference with primary agricultural activities, community acceptance, productivity, sales profit level, ease of sale and cultivation, tools availability, and technological sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was categorized as very sustainable with a value of 79.67. This index consisted of the environmental (75.15), social (83.80), economical (77.46), and technological dimensions (82.28). The average productivity at the study site was 6-7 tons per hectare (tons/ha), with a production potency of 300-350 tons/year. Additionally, the potency of sorghum stover production was 471.8 ton per year of dry matter and could be used as feed for 163 animal units/year.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 758
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and development of a measuring method for environmental sustainability in food production systems
    Gerbens-Leenes, PW
    Moll, HC
    Uiterkamp, AJMS
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) : 231 - 248
  • [32] Sustainability in Italian Ceramic Tile Production: Evaluation of the Environmental Impact
    Boschi, Giacomo
    Masi, Giulia
    Bonvicini, Giuliana
    Bignozzi, Maria Chiara
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 15
  • [33] A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches
    J. Sillman
    V. Uusitalo
    V. Ruuskanen
    L. Ojala
    H. Kahiluoto
    R. Soukka
    J. Ahola
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 2190 - 2203
  • [34] A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches
    Sillman, J.
    Uusitalo, V.
    Ruuskanen, V.
    Ojala, L.
    Kahiluoto, H.
    Soukka, R.
    Ahola, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (11): : 2190 - 2203
  • [35] Sensitivity analysis of the smart city environmental sustainability index (SCESI)
    Shruti
    Singh P.K.
    Ohri A.
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2021, 20 (02) : 703 - 711
  • [36] Editorial: The Sustainability Challenge: New Perspectives on the Use of Microbial Approaches and Their Impact on Food and Feed
    Coda, Rossana
    Gianotti, Andrea
    Gomes, Ana
    Rizzello, Carlo G.
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 7
  • [37] Environmental sustainability analysis of a protein-rich livestock feed ingredient in The Netherlands: Microalgae production versus soybean import
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    De Meester, Steven
    Van Dijk, Wim
    da Silva, Vamilson
    Dewulf, Jo
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 101 : 61 - 72
  • [38] Coupling sorghum biomass and wheat straw to minimise the environmental impact of bioenergy production
    Serra, P.
    Giuntoli, J.
    Agostini, A.
    Colauzzi, M.
    Amaducci, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 154 : 242 - 254
  • [39] EARTHWORMS FOR FEED PRODUCTION FROM VEGETABLE WASTE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    Conti, Cecilia
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Tedesco, Doriana
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (10): : 2117 - 2122
  • [40] Impact of consumer behaviour on the environmental sustainability profile of food production and consumption chains-a case study on chicken meat
    Cooreman-Algoed, Margot
    Boone, Lieselot
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Van Hemelryck, Steven
    Brunson, Aurore
    Dewulf, Jo
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 178