Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer

被引:4
|
作者
Salouti, Ramin [1 ,2 ]
Razeghinejad, Reza [3 ]
Masihpour, Nasrin [1 ]
Ghoreyshi, Maryam [2 ,4 ]
Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Poostchi Clin, Zand St, Shiraz 7134997446, Iran
[2] Salouti Eye Clin, Salouti Cornea Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Glaucoma Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Agreement; Central corneal thickness; Corvis ST; Ocular response analyzer; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; HYPERTENSION TREATMENT; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; NONCONTACT; TOPOGRAPHY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-020-01436-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the agreement and interchangeability of noncontact devices of ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST in central corneal thickness measurement. Methods In this prospective comparative study, central corneal thickness (CCT) readings of 284 healthy, nonglaucoma subjects, without previous ocular surgery, were measured with ORA and Corvis ST. Only data from right eyes were analyzed. The mean values of CCT measurements by the ORA versus Corvis ST were compared with the paired sample t test. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) were used to assess the agreement between the measurements of the two devices. Results The mean (+/- standard deviation) age of the participants was 28.0 +/- 4.9 years, and 36.6% were male. The mean CCT measurements were 555 +/- 32 mu m by the ORA and 536 +/- 32 mu m with the Corvis ST (P < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.964 (P < 0.001). The 95% LOA between the ORA and the Corvis ST was 2.2 to 35.9 mu m. Conclusions The ORA measured the CCT up to 35.9 mu m greater than Corvis ST. Therefore, the two devices may not be used interchangeably for measuring CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:2563 / 2567
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IOP Measurement and Central Corneal Thickness
    Stodtmeister, Richard
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (12) : 2647 - 2648
  • [42] Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST)
    Steinberg, J.
    Mehlan, J.
    Frings, A.
    Druchkiv, V.
    Richard, G.
    Katz, T.
    Linke, S. J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2015, 112 (09): : 770 - 777
  • [43] Assessing Corneal Hysteresis Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
    McMonnies, Charles W.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (03) : E343 - E349
  • [44] A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST
    Tejwani, Sushma
    Dinakaran, Shoruba
    Joshi, Anuja
    Shetty, Rohit
    Roy, Abhijit Sinha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 63 (11) : 815 - 820
  • [45] Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer
    Kotecha, Aachal
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Roberts, Cynthia R.
    Zhu, Haogang
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (12) : 5337 - 5347
  • [46] Improved Keratoconus Detection by Ocular Response Analyzer Testing After Consideration of Corneal Thickness as a Confounding Factor
    Gaston Galletti, Jeremias
    Pfoertner, Tomas
    Fuentes Bonthoux, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03) : 202 - U131
  • [47] Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer
    Oddone, F
    Kotecha, A
    Shewry, J
    White, ET
    Garway-Heath, DF
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [48] Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
    Kiraly, Laszlo
    Stange, Jana
    Kunert, Kathleen S.
    Sel, Saadettin
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [49] Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Singh, RP
    Goldberg, I
    Graham, SL
    Sharma, A
    Mohsin, M
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2001, 10 (03) : 206 - 210
  • [50] Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study
    Tarannum Mansoori
    Nagalla Balakrishna
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 959 - 966