Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer

被引:4
|
作者
Salouti, Ramin [1 ,2 ]
Razeghinejad, Reza [3 ]
Masihpour, Nasrin [1 ]
Ghoreyshi, Maryam [2 ,4 ]
Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Poostchi Clin, Zand St, Shiraz 7134997446, Iran
[2] Salouti Eye Clin, Salouti Cornea Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Glaucoma Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Agreement; Central corneal thickness; Corvis ST; Ocular response analyzer; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; HYPERTENSION TREATMENT; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; NONCONTACT; TOPOGRAPHY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-020-01436-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the agreement and interchangeability of noncontact devices of ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST in central corneal thickness measurement. Methods In this prospective comparative study, central corneal thickness (CCT) readings of 284 healthy, nonglaucoma subjects, without previous ocular surgery, were measured with ORA and Corvis ST. Only data from right eyes were analyzed. The mean values of CCT measurements by the ORA versus Corvis ST were compared with the paired sample t test. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) were used to assess the agreement between the measurements of the two devices. Results The mean (+/- standard deviation) age of the participants was 28.0 +/- 4.9 years, and 36.6% were male. The mean CCT measurements were 555 +/- 32 mu m by the ORA and 536 +/- 32 mu m with the Corvis ST (P < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.964 (P < 0.001). The 95% LOA between the ORA and the Corvis ST was 2.2 to 35.9 mu m. Conclusions The ORA measured the CCT up to 35.9 mu m greater than Corvis ST. Therefore, the two devices may not be used interchangeably for measuring CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:2563 / 2567
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanics of the Cornea Evaluated by Spectral Analysis of Waveforms from Ocular Response Analyzer and Corvis-ST
    Tejwani, Sushma
    Shetty, Rohit
    Kurien, Mathew
    Dinakaran, Shoruba
    Ghosh, Arkasubhra
    Roy, Abhijit Sinha
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [22] Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Keratoconus With Normal Central Corneal Thickness Compared With Matched Normal Control Eyes
    Fontes, Bruno M.
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Velarde, Guillermo Coca
    Nose, Walton
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) : 209 - 215
  • [23] Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients
    Melis Palamar
    Cumali Degirmenci
    Ilgen Ertam
    Ayse Yagci
    International Ophthalmology, 2017, 37 : 7 - 11
  • [24] Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters. A praxis-related overview
    Herber, R.
    Terai, N.
    Pillunat, K. R.
    Raiskup, F.
    Pillunat, L. E.
    Spoerl, E.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2018, 115 (08): : 635 - 643
  • [25] Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients
    Palamar, Melis
    Degirmenci, Cumali
    Ertam, Ilgen
    Yagci, Ayse
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [26] Relationship between corneal hysteresis (CH) as measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corneal central thickness (CCT) as determined using Pentacam in childhood glaucoma (CG) patients
    Perucho Gonzalez, Lucia
    Saenz-Frances, Federico
    Morales Fernendez, Laura
    Mendez-Hernandez, Carmen
    Martinez de la Casa, Jose Maria
    Perez Bartolome, Francisco
    Santos Bueso, Enrique
    Garcia Feijoo, Julian
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [27] Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Lorenz, Georg
    Jasper, Carolin S.
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Pillunat, Karin R.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [28] Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness
    Argus, WA
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) : 1810 - 1812
  • [29] Correlations among Corneal Biomechanical Parameters, Stiffness, and Thickness Measured Using Corvis ST and Pentacam in Patients with Ocular Hypertension
    Liu, Qian
    Pang, Chenjiu
    Liu, Changgeng
    Cheng, Wenjun
    Ming, Shuai
    Du, Wenwen
    Feng, Xiaomei
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [30] Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus
    Sorkin, Nir
    Ohri, Anamika
    Jung, Hyejung
    Haines, Lacey
    Sorbara, Luigina
    Mimouni, Michael
    Singal, Neera
    Hatch, Wendy
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 105 (10) : 1371 - 1375